Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 18;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01362-z

Table 15.

Interpretation of regressions between total lost productivity (LP) and migraine-attributed impairment (maI) in all countries ordered by increasing population mean maI

Value item Country
Pakistan Nepal India Russia China Lithuania + Luxembourg Ethiopia Spain
Population mean maI1 (arbitrary units) 10.8 14.2 15.1 17.2 19.7 20.1 21.2 22.2
Regression equation2 (Y=) 0.05x + 7.2 0.01x + 1.9 0.07x + 0.6 0.02x + 1.9 0.15x + 3.4 0.06 + 1.4 0.03x + 2.1 0.13x + 2.8
Population-level LP3 (Y):
Y1 where x = maI 7.74 2.04 1.66 2.24 6.36 2.60 2.74 5.69
Y2 where x = 0.5*maI4 7.47 1.97 1.13 2.07 4.88 2.00 2.42 4.24
Y2/Y1 0.97 0.97 0.68 0.93 0.77 0.77 0.88 0.75
Recovery of LP for 50% reduction in maI (%)5 3 3 32 7 23 23 12 25
Pro rata recovery of LP per unit reduction in maI 0.06 0.06 0.64 0.14 0.46 0.46 0.24 0.50

1From Table 1; 2 from Table 13; 3 calculated from regression equation; 4 assuming intervention has achieved 50% reduction; 5 calculated as [1-(Y2/Y1)]*100; see text for further explanations