Table 3.
Comparison of allelic distributions of six SNPs in EAAT1 and EAAT2 genes between patients and controls
| Gene | SNP | Allele | Case | Control | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAAT1 | rs2269272 | C | 321 (0.689) | 474 (0.693) | 0.022 | 0.881 |
| T | 145 (0.311) | 210 (0.307) | ||||
| rs2731880 | C | 274 (0.588) | 443 (0.648) | 4.205 | 0.040 | |
| T | 192 (0.412) | 241 (0.352) | ||||
| EAAT2 | rs3088168 | C | 189 (0.406) | 313 (0.458) | 3.050 | 0.081 |
| T | 277 (0.594) | 371 (0.542) | ||||
| rs10836387 | G | 160 (0.343) | 252 (0.368) | 0.758 | 0.384 | |
| A | 306 (0.657) | 432 (0.632) | ||||
| rs12294045 | C | 330 (0.708) | 535 (0.782) | 8.144 | 0.004* | |
| T | 136 (0.292) | 149 (0.218) | ||||
| rs12360706 | G | 376 (0.807) | 559 (0.876) | 0.197 | 0.657 | |
| A | 90 (0.193) | 125 (0.124) | ||||
Notes: Bolded indicates statistically significant (p < 0.05)
*indicates the difference was still significant after Bonferroni correction