Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;7(4):e356–e365. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00040-8

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Simulated number of SARS-CoV-2 cases when face masks are used for different durations after the final vaccination coverage is achieved

(A) 70% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=5, and vaccination coverage achieved by Jan 1, 2022. (B) 70% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=8, and vaccination coverage achieved by Jan 1, 2022. (C) 70% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=5, and vaccination coverage achieved by March 1, 2022. (D) 70% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=8, and vaccination coverage achieved by March 1, 2022. (E) 50% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=5, and vaccination coverage achieved by Jan 1, 2022. (F) 50% vaccine efficacy with SARS-CoV-2 R0=5, and vaccination coverage achieved by March 1, 2022. Maintaining face mask use for longer provided more benefits with lower vaccine efficacies and with increases in R0. Note the differences in scales across the panels, which was done to more readily see when outcomes levelled off with increases in the time face masks were used.