Table 3.
Comparison of RIG/RMAb volume required based on wound site, size and severity (n = 1428)
| Characteristics of wound | RIG/RMAb Median volume (ml) (Q1, Q3) | Min (ml) | Max (ml) | Kruskal Wallis test P- value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Head, neck & face (n = 126) | 1.2 (0.8, 2.5) | 0.2 | 7.0 | χ2 = 105.41; <0.0001 |
| Trunk (n = 61) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.5) | 0.4 | 9.1 | ||
| Genitals (n = 18) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.0) | 0.2 | 1.4 | ||
| Upper Limb (n = 519) | 2.0 (0.8, 3.0) | 0.1 | 8.5 | ||
| Lower Limb (n = 704) | 2.5 (1.5, 3.5) | 0.2 | 9.0 | ||
| Severity | Abrasion (n = 642) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | 0.1 | 9.1 | χ2 = 11.49; 0.003 |
| Laceration (n = 417) | 2.5 (1.0, 3.7) | 0.2 | 8.5 | ||
| Puncture wound (n = 369) | 2.0 (1.2, 2.8) | 0.1 | 7.0 | ||
| Size | <1 cm (n = 582) | 1.2 (0.8, 2.0) | 0.1 | 6.0 | χ2 = 374.34; <0.0001 |
| 1–5 cm (n = 792) | 2.8 (2.0, 3.7) | 0.3 | 8.5 | ||
| >5 cm (n = 54) | 5.1 (3.7, 7.0) | 2.0 | 9.1 | ||