Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):65–73. doi: 10.18295/squmj.5.2021.094

Table 2.

Student responses to the questionnaire evaluating the perceptions of the impact of the preparatory year programme at health professions education colleges of King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (N = 633)*

No. Statement n (%)
Disagree Neutral Agree
University conduct
1 The preparatory year made me self-confident 204 (32.2) 117 (18.5) 312 (49.2)
2 The preparatory year reinforced my discipline 217 (34.3) 119 (18.8) 297 (46.9)
3 The preparatory year reinforced my sense of responsibility 157 (24.8) 93 (14.7) 383 (60.5)
4 The preparatory year helped me adapt to the university educational environment 139 (22.0) 87 (13.7) 407 (64.3)
5 Preparatory year classes helped me select my major 370 (58.5) 103 (16.3) 160 (25.3)
6 I feel that the preparatory year classes prepared me well for my major’s classes. 362 (57.2) 103 (16.3) 168 (26.5)
Perception of faculty, teaching and assessment
7 The preparatory year provided activities that developed my various personal skills (e.g., social, physical, cultural, creative) 410 (64.8) 110 (17.4) 113 (17.9)
8 Communication with faculty was easy 221 (34.9) 155 (24.5) 257 (40.6)
9 The faculty motivated me to develop my creative and innovative abilities 357 (56.4) 163 (25.8) 113 (17.9)
10 The faculty showed attributes of professionalism (e.g. honesty, integrity, altruism, etc. 285 (45.0) 184 (29.1) 164 (25.9)
11 My academic counsellor was helpful 370 (58.5) 149 (23.5) 114 (18.3)
12 Interactions with my academic counsellor were adequate and fruitful 365 (57.7) 161 (25.4) 107 (16.9)
13 Teaching was interactive rather than spoon-feeding 338 (53.4) 164 (25.9) 131 (20.7)
14 Feedback on student assessment was helpful 235 (37.1) 208 (32.9) 190 (30.0)
Administrative and regulatory matters
15 Student support services (i.e. academic, social, psychological) were adequate 235 (37.1) 215 (34.0) 183 (28.9)
16 Assessment tasks (e.g. tests, projects, assignments) were appropriate 217 (34.3) 127 (20.1) 289 (45.7)
17 Introductory (awareness) sessions were planned with the newcomer students 200 (31.6) 144 (22.7) 289 (45.7)
18 Students’ guidebook was informative and adequate 149 (23.5) 131 (20.7) 353 (55.8)
19 Teaching timetables were set out appropriately 197 (31.1) 122 (19.3) 314 (49.6)
20 Academic affairs services (e.g. withdrawal, course additions and deletions, postponing, excuses) were easily accessible 185 (29.2) 186 (29.4) 262 (41.4)
Facilities and services
21 The facilities (e.g. library, computers, data-shows, smart boards) were appropriate 119 (18.8) 112 (17.7) 402 (63.5)
22 Places designated for student rest and sitting were appropriate 219 (34.6) 125 (19.8) 289 (45.7)
23 Food purchasing areas were suitable for all students 357 (56.4) 100 (15.8) 176 (27.8)
General perception after completing the preparatory year
24 I have confidence in my ability to research information 149 (23.5) 156 (24.6) 328 (51.8)
25 My thinking skills (e.g. interpretation, analysis, inference, explanation) have improved 193 (30.5) 145 (22.9) 295 (46.6)
26 My computer skills became more sophisticated 208 (32.9) 133 (21.0) 292 (46.1)
27 My research skills became more sophisticated 241 (38.1) 178 (28.1) 214 (33.8)
28 My scientific writing skills became more sophisticated 254 (40.1) 157 (24.8) 222 (35.1)
29 I can access and use learning resources (e.g. library and internet resources) 172 (27.2) 122 (19.3) 339 (53.6)
30 My skills in applying knowledge have improved 200 (31.6) 178 (28.1) 255 (40.3)
*

The 5-point scale was collapsed to 3 points for easy interpretation of results and increasing cell sample size. Both “Agree” and “Strongly Agree” were considered as “Agree” while both “Disagree” and “Strongly Disagree” were considered as “Disagree”.