Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;16:773593. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.773593

TABLE 3.

ROI weights and voxel sizes of the circuit predicting the CTQ-Emotional neglect for HC.

Label Significance (%) Volume (Voxels)
Cerebelum_7b_R 2.0262 692
Vermis_9 1.8854 388
Cerebelum_9_L 1.5372 1407
Cerebelum_Crus2_L 1.4105 4105
Cerebelum_9_R 1.4088 1320
Cerebelum_Crus2_R 1.3980 3901
Heschl_L 1.3388 549
Cingulum_Mid_R 1.3229 5244
Cerebelum_Crus1_L 1.3014 5334
Precentral_R 1.2832 6310
Occipital_Inf_L 1.2767 2264
Cerebelum_8_R 1.2642 2603
Cerebelum_7b_L 1.2502 863
Cerebelum_4_5_L 1.2483 2715
Cingulum_Ant_R 1.2218 3123
Frontal_Mid_R 1.1987 9213
Frontal_Mid_Orb_R 1.1778 1583
Frontal_Inf_Tri_R 1.1656 3654
Occipital_Mid_R 1.1603 4649
Cerebelum_8_L 1.1493 2619
Vermis_3 1.1471 522
Frontal_Mid_L 1.1403 11129
Frontal_Inf_Orb_R 1.1205 3635
Temporal_Inf_L 1.1099 7081
Cerebelum_10_R 1.1086 286
Fusiform_R 1.1074 5731
Angular_L 1.0897 2739
Vermis_4_5 1.0742 1489
Paracentral_Lobule_L 1.0715 2490
Angular_R 1.0657 3628
SupraMarginal_L 1.0509 2879
Cerebelum_4_5_R 1.0329 1938
Parietal_Sup_L 1.0182 4364
Postcentral_R 1.0155 6986
Rectus_L 1.0145 1780
Temporal_Pole_Mid_R 1.0123 1810
Temporal_Sup_L 1.0008 5312

Only regions with at least 1% contribution to the model are reported.