Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;30(3):349–362. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00987-7

Table 1.

Performance of different PRS models in five-fold cross-validation of OCAC data.

Model Number of SNPsa Tuning parameter for best performance AUC OR per 1 SD of PRS 95% CI
(a) Models based on individual level genotype data
Lasso 1403 λ = 3.3 0.583 1.35 1.30–1.39
Elastic net 10,797 λ = 3.3, κ = −2.2 0.586 1.36 1.31–1.40
MCP 1403 λ = 3.3 0.583 1.35 1.30–1.39
(b) Models based on summary statistics
LDPred 5,291,719 ρ = 0.001 0.552 1.21 1.13–1.29
Stepwise 22 λ = 5.4 0.572 1.30 1.26–1.34
Select and Shrink (OCAC) 27,240 a = 2.75, b = 2, φ = 3e−6 0.593 1.39 1.34–1.44

AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve AUC), OR odds ratio, SD standard deviation, PRS polygenic risk score, CI confidence interval, NA not applicable.

aNumber of SNPs in PRS model run on full OCAC data set after selection of model parameters.