Table 1.
Performance of different PRS models in five-fold cross-validation of OCAC data.
Model | Number of SNPsa | Tuning parameter for best performance | AUC | OR per 1 SD of PRS | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Models based on individual level genotype data | |||||
Lasso | 1403 | λ = 3.3 | 0.583 | 1.35 | 1.30–1.39 |
Elastic net | 10,797 | λ = 3.3, κ = −2.2 | 0.586 | 1.36 | 1.31–1.40 |
MCP | 1403 | λ = 3.3 | 0.583 | 1.35 | 1.30–1.39 |
(b) Models based on summary statistics | |||||
LDPred | 5,291,719 | ρ = 0.001 | 0.552 | 1.21 | 1.13–1.29 |
Stepwise | 22 | λ = 5.4 | 0.572 | 1.30 | 1.26–1.34 |
Select and Shrink (OCAC) | 27,240 | a = 2.75, b = 2, φ = 3e−6 | 0.593 | 1.39 | 1.34–1.44 |
AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve AUC), OR odds ratio, SD standard deviation, PRS polygenic risk score, CI confidence interval, NA not applicable.
aNumber of SNPs in PRS model run on full OCAC data set after selection of model parameters.