Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;12:3753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07760-w

Table 3.

Burrows of bandicoot rats, B. bengalensis as influenced by different crop establishment-cum-residue management (CERM) and winter crops in rice-fallow system of eastern India (after 4th years of experimentation: 2019–2020).

CERM Rodent burrow (no./62.5 m2) Mean
R–C R–L R–SF R–Li R–M
Conservation agriculture (CA)
 R− 2.00 ± 0.58 1.33 ± 0.33 0.33 ± 0.00 1.67 ± 0.33 2 ± 0 1.47C
 R+  5.33 ± 0.33 8.00 ± 0.58 2.33 ± 0.33 1.67 ± 0.33 3.67 ± 0.33 4.20A
Partial conservation agriculture
 R− 2.67 ± 0.33 0.67 ± 0.19 0.67 ± 0.19 1.00 ± 0.00 2.00 ± 0.58 1.40C
 R+  4.00 ± 0.58 2.67 ± 0.33 1.67 ± 0.67 1.67 ± 0.33 3.00 ± 0.58 2.60B
Farmer practices (FP)
 R 2.00 ± 0.58 2.33 ± 0.33 1.33 ± 0.33 2.33 ± 0.33 0.33 ± 0.00 1.67C
 R+  2.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 0.58 2.00 ± 0.58 3.67 ± 0.33 2.00 ± 0.58 2.53B
Mean 3.00A 3.00A 1.39C 2.00B 2.17B
LSD (p = 0.05) CERM WC CERM*WC
0.51 0.47 1.15

R+: residue retention (30% RT), R: control; R–C: Rice–Chickpea; R–L: Rice–Lentil; R–SF: Rice–Safflower; R–Li: Rice–Linseed; R–M: Rice–Mustard; Different capital letters (vertical) represent significant variations in CERM; Different (horizontal) capital letters indicate significant variations in different cropping sequences; Values with ± represent standard error of mean.