Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;12:3753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07760-w

Table 4.

Burrows of bandicoot rats, B. bengalensis as influenced by different crop establishment-cum-residue management (CERM) and winter crops in rice-fallow system of eastern India (after 5th years of experimentation: 2020–2021).

CERM Rodent burrow (no./62.5 m2) Mean
R–C R–L R–SF R–Li R–M
Conservation agriculture (CA)
 R− 3.67 ± 0.33 6.00 ± 0.58 0.33 ± 0.00 5.00 ± 0.58 22.67 ± 0.67 7.53C
 R+  12.67 ± 0.33 11.33 ± 0.33 5.00 ± 0.58 6.67 ± 0.33 32.67 ± 0.67 13.67A
Partial conservation agriculture
 R− 4.67 ± 0.33 4.67 ± 0.33 2.67 ± 0.33 4.00 ± 0.58 7.67 ± 0.33 4.73D
 R+  6.00 ± 0.58 8.67 ± 0.33 5.33 ± 0.33 14.67 ± 0.33 10.00 ± 0.58 8.93B
Farmer practices (FP)
 R− 2.00 ± 0.00 0.67 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 7.33 ± 0.67 7.00 ± 0.58 3.60E
 R+  3.33 ± 0.33 4 ± 0.58 2.33 ± 0.33 14.33 ± 0.88 10.67 ± 0.33 6.93C
Mean 5.39C 5.89C 2.78D 8.67B 15.11A
LSD (p = 0.05) CERM WC CERM*WC
0.62 0.54 1.33

R+: residue retention (30% RT), R: control; R–C: Rice–Chickpea; R–L: Rice–Lentil; R–SF: Rice–Safflower; R–Li: Rice–Linseed; R–M: Rice–Mustard; Different capital letters (vertical) represent significant variations in CERM; Different (horizontal) capital letters indicate significant variations in different cropping sequences; Values with ± represent standard error of mean.