Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;9:842823. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842823

Table 3.

Relationship between the expression of CEBPA and the pathobiological characteristics of ovarian cancer patients [n (%)].

Project Total number of cases (n = 71) CEBPA negative expression group (n = 22) CEBPA positive expression group (n = 49) χ2 value P-value
Age 0.280 0.596
<50 years old 29 10 (45.45%) 19 (38.78%)
≥50 years old 42 12 (54.55%) 30 (61.22%)
FIGO stage 0.126 0.723
I,II 28 8 (36.36%) 20 (40.82%)
III,IV 43 14 (63.64%) 29 (59.18%)
Histologic type 1.656 0.647
Serous cystadenocarcinoma 32 10 (45.45%) 22 (44.90%)
Mucosal cystadenocarcinoma 11 5 (22.73%) 6 (12.24%)
Endometrial carcinoma of ovary 25 6 (27.27%) 19 (38.78%)
Clear cell carcinoma 3 1 (4.55%) 2 (4.08%)
Degree of histological differentiation 4.553 0.103
Highly differentiated 15 8 (36.36%) 7 (14.29%)
Middle differentiation 42 11 (50.00%) 31 (63.27%)
Poorly differentiated 14 3 (13.64%) 11 (22.45%)
Lymph node metastasis 0.006 0.937
Without 35 11 (50.00%) 24 (48.98%)
With 36 11 (50.00%) 25 (51.02%)

CEBPA, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha.