Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;13:793094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.793094

Table 1.

Study characteristics.

Study ED sample Sample size N (%) Female Age M (SD) BMI M (SD) Emotion regulation measure ED symptomatology measure Emotion regulation category Correlation [95% CI]
Acceptance
Brytek-Matera and Schiltz (20) AN, BN 52 52 (100%) 19.6 (2.6) 18.1 (2.5) SVF120 Acceptance ED pathology Non-acceptance 0.56 [0.28, 0.84]
Aloi et al. (21) BED 46 40 (87%) 40.6 (12.7) 38.8 (7.1) DERS non-acceptance BES total Non-acceptance 0.32 [0.02, 0.62]
Aloi et al. (22) BED 155 86.5% 41.2 (13.2) 37.9 (10.4) DERS non-acceptance EDI total Non-acceptance 0.16 [0.0004, 0.32]
Blomquist et al. (23) BED 168 120 (71.4%) 48.3 (10.2) 38.8 (5.7) DERS non-acceptance ELOC total Non-acceptance 0.40 [0.25, 0.56]
Bodell et al. (24) BN, BED, OSFED 97 89 (91.8%) 38.4 (13.9) 37.2 (11.3) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.41 [0.20, 0.61]
Brown et al. (25) AN, BN, ARFID, OSFED 364 94.4% 20.9 (9.3) NR DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.59 [0.49, 0.69]
Hazzard et al. (26) BED 112 92 (82.1%) 39.7 (13.4) > 21.0 DERS non-acceptance EDE total Non-acceptance 0.23 [0.05, 0.42]
Juarascio et al. (27) AN, BN, ENDOS 120 120 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS non-acceptance EDQOL total Non-acceptance 0.23 [0.05, 0.42]
Kenny et al. (28) BED 71 93% 40.4 (11.4) 37.7 (9.6) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.47 [0.23, 0.71]
Lavender et al. (29) BN 80 72 (90%) 27.3 (9.6) 23.9 (5.5) DERS non-acceptance EDE total Non-acceptance 0.31 [0.09, 0.53]
MacDonald et al. (30) BN, OSFED 104 93.3% 28.8 (9.0) 24.1 (6.3) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.37 [0.17, 0.56]
MacDonald et al. (31) BN, PD 44 44 (100%) 27.3 (8.4) 24.6 (5.8) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.29 [-0.02, 0.59]
Michael and Juarascio (32) AN, BN, BED 111 111 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.35 [0.26, 0.54]
Monell et al. (33) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 999 999 (100%) 24.8 (8.4) 21.5 (5.2) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.36 [0.30, 0.43]
Pisetsky et al. (35) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 110 93.6% 33.5 (12.2) 28.1 (11.2) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.22 [0.03, 0.41]
Racine and Wildes (36) AN 192 183 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS non-acceptance EDE total Non-acceptance 0.38 [0.25, 0.53]
Racine and Wildes (37) AN 191 182 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS non-acceptance EDE total Non-acceptance 0.89 [0.74, 1.03]
Rania et al. (38) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 2405 2303 (95.8%) 22.5 (8.6) 21.7 (6.1) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.38 [0.34, 0.42]
Southward et al. (39) BN, BED 107 107 (100%) 35.2 (12.5) 30.7 (11.1) DERS non-acceptance EDE total Non-acceptance 0.37 [0.17, 0.56]
Steinglass et al. (40) AN 20 20 (100%) 32.0 (10.4) 15.8 (1.6) DERS non-acceptance EDE restraint Non-acceptance 1.00 [0.52, 1.47]
Svaldi et al. (41) AN, BN, BED 63 63 (100%) 30.7 (8.6) 25.4 (4.3) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.50 [0.24, 0.75]
Turan et al. (42) BED 32 18 (57.6%) 15.0 (1.4) 34.6 (3.0) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58]
Wisting et al. (43) AN, BN, BED 272 272 (100%) 29.4 (8.8) 24.3 (8.4) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.47 [0.35, 0.59]
Wolz et al. (44) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 134 121 (90.3%) 28.8 (10.4) 25.0 (9.1) DERS non-acceptance EDI total Non-acceptance 0.54 [0.36, 0.71]
Wyssen et al. (45) AN, BN 112 112 (100%) 23.0 (4.3) 19.8 (2.1) DERS non-acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.42 [0.24, 0.61]
Cowdrey and Park (46) AN 42 42 (100%) 24.0 (8.3) 19.6 (2.5) AAQ-II total EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.51 [0.20, 0.82]
Dajon and Sudres (47) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 97 97 (100%) 35.8 (13.1) 24.7 (7.0) AAQ-II total EDI drive for thinness Non-acceptance −0.27 [-0.47,−0.07]
Lee et al. (48) AN, BN, EDNOS 132 132 (100%) 19.1 (5.8) 19.3 (3.7) AAQ-II total EDI drive for thinness Non-acceptance 0.63 [0.46, 0.81]
Manwaring et al. (49) AN, BN, EDNOS 281 264 (94.0%) 26.6 (9.4) 17.3 (3.7) AAQ-W total EDI ED risk Non-acceptance 0.99 [0.88, 1.11]
Walden et al. (50) AN, BN, EDNOS 617 (94.6%) 28.0 (10.0) NR AAQ-W total EDI drive for thinness Non-acceptance 0.81 [0.73, 0.89]
Butryn et al. (51) AN, BN, EDNOS 88 88 (100%) 26.5 (12.2) NR PHLMS acceptance EDEQ total Non-acceptance 0.26 [0.04, 0.47]
Awareness
Aloi et al. (21 ) BED 46 40 (87%) 40.6 (12.7) 38.8 (7.1) DERS lack of awareness BES total Lack of awareness 0.09 [-0.21, 0.39]
Aloi et al. (22) BED 155 86.5% 41.2 (13.2) 37.9 (10.4) DERS lack of awareness EDI total Lack of awareness 0.12 [-0.04, 0.28]
Blomquist et al. (23) BED 168 120 (71.4%) 48.3 (10.2) 38.8 (5.7) DERS lack of awareness ELOC total Lack of awareness 0.04 [-0.12, 0.19]
Bodell et al. (24) BN, BED, OSFED 97 89 (91.8%) 38.4 (13.9) 37.2 (11.3) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness −0.08 [-0.28, 0.12]
Brown et al. (25) AN, BN, ARFID, OSFED 364 94.4% 20.9 (9.3) NR DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.35 [0.25, 0.45]
Hazzard et al. (26) BED 112 92 (82.1%) 39.7 (13.4) > 21.0 DERS lack of awareness EDE total Lack of awareness 0.07 [-0.12, 0.26]
Juarascio et al. (27) AN, BN, ENDOS 120 120 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS lack of awareness EDQOL total Lack of awareness −0.07 [-0.25, 1.11]
Kenny et al. (28) BED 71 93% 40.4 (11.4) 37.7 (9.6) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness −0.06 [-0.30, 0.18]
Lavender et al. (29) BN 80 72 (90%) 27.3 (9.6) 23.9 (5.5) DERS lack of awareness EDE total Lack of awareness 0.04 [-0.18, 0.26]
MacDonald et al. (30) BN, OSFED 104 93.3% 28.8 (9.0) 24.1 (6.3) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.14 [-0.05, 0.34]
MacDonald et al. (31) BN, PD 44 44 (100%) 27.3 (8.4) 24.6 (5.8) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.31 [0.003, 0.62]
Michael and Juarascio (32) AN, BN, BED 109 109 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness −0.31 [-0.50,−0.12]
Monell et al. (33) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 999 999 (100%) 24.8 (8.4) 21.5 (5.2) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.30 [0.24, 0.36]
Pisetsky et al. (35) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 110 93.6% 33.5 (12.2) 28.1 (11.2) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.32 [0.13, 0.51]
Racine and Wildes (36) AN 192 183 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS lack of awareness EDE total Lack of awareness 0.38 [0.25, 0.53]
Racine and Wildes (37) AN 191 182 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS lack of awareness EDE total Lack of awareness 0.55 [0.41, 0.69]
Rania et al. (38) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 2405 2303 (95.8%) 22.5 (8.6) 21.7 (6.1) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.28 [0.24, 0.32]
Southward et al. (39) BN, BED 107 107 (100%) 35.2 (12.5) 30.7 (11.1) DERS lack of awareness EDE total Lack of awareness 0.05 [-0.14, 0.24]
Steinglass et al. (40) AN 20 20 (100%) 32.0 (10.4) 15.8 (1.6) DERS lack of awareness EDE restraint Lack of awareness 0.16 [-0.31, 0.64]
Svaldi et al. (41) AN, BN, BED 63 63 (100%) 30.7 (8.6) 25.4 (4.3) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.34 [0.09, 0.60]
Turan et al. (42) BED 32 18 (57.6%) 15.0 (1.4) 34.6 (3.0) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.14 [-0.22, 0.51]
Wisting et al. (43) AN, BN, BED 272 272 (100%) 29.4 (8.8) 24.3 (8.4) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.30 [0.18, 0.42]
Wolz et al. (44) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 134 121 (90.3%) 28.8 (10.4) 25.0 (9.1) DERS lack of awareness EDI total Lack of awareness 0.15 [-0.02, 0.32]
Wyssen et al. (45) AN, BN 112 112 (100%) 23.0 (4.3) 19.8 (2.1) DERS lack of awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.32 [0.13, 0.51]
Legenbauer et al. (52) BN 20 20 (100%) 22.7 (4.4) 20.8 (2.3) ACF total EDI drive for thinness Lack of awareness 1.39 [0.91, 1.86]
Bernatova and Svetlak (53) AN, BN 73 73 (100%) 15.5 (1.3) 17.3 (3.4) LEAS awareness of emotions in self RS total Lack of awareness −0.40 [-0.63,−0.17]
Butryn et al. (51) AN, BN, EDNOS 88 88 (100%) 26.5 (12.2) NR PHLMS awareness EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.50 [0.28, 0.71]
Dunne et al. (54) AN, atypical AN 59 59 (100%) 25.7 (8.8) 19.0 CAMS-R total EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.25 [-0.01, 0.51]
Torres et al. (55) BED 7 7 (100%) 38.3 (9.3) 34.6 (3.9) EPS impoverished emotion experience DEBQ total Lack of awareness 0.40 [-0.58, 1.38]
Messer et al. (56) BN 145 NR NR NR MAAS total EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.12 [-0.04, 0.29]
BED 150 NR NR NR MAAS total EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.18 [0.02, 0.34]
Compare et al. (57) BED 150 98 (65.3%) 49.3 (4.1) 33.1 (1.2) FFMQ total BES total Lack of awareness 0.39 [0.23, 0.55]
Cowdrey and Park (46) AN 42 42 (100%) 24.0 (8.3) 19.6 (2.5) FFMQ total EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.68 [0.36, 0.99]
Lattimore et al. (58) AN, BN, BED 39 39 (100%) 29.0 (9.4) NR FFMQ total EDI drive for thinness Lack of awareness 0.48 [0.16, 0.81]
Pepping et al. (59) BN, BED, EDNOS 55 55 (100%) 39.0 (12.7) NR FFMQ total EDI dive for thinness Lack of awareness 0.22 [-0.05, 0.50]
Pinto-Gouveia et al. (60) BED 33 33 (100%) 41.9 (9.8) 34.8 (5.2) FFMQ total EDE total Lack of awareness −0.07 [-0.43, 0.28]
Espel-Huynh et al. (61) AN, BN, EDNOS 531 531 (100%) 25.3 (11.1) NR SMQ total PMT ED behaviours Lack of awareness 0.42 [0.34, 0.51]
Scharff et al. (62) AN, BN, OSFED 1042 1042 (100%) 25.3 (10.6) 23.3 (8.9) SMQ total EDEQ total Lack of awareness 0.47 [0.41, 0.53]
Manwaring et al. (49) AN, BN, EDNOS 281 264 (94.0%) 26.6 (9.4) 17.3 (3.7) KIMS total EDI ED risk Lack of awareness 0.99 [0.88, 1.11]
Problem solving
Paterson et al. (63) AN 55 55 (100%) 24.6 (6.8) 14.6 (2.2) SPSI-R negative problem orientation EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.57 [0.29, 0.84]
Paterson et al. (64) AN 27 27 (100%) 26.5 (7.9) 18.0 (3.3) SPSI-R negative problem orientation EAT total Problem solving difficulties 0.44 [0.04, 0.84]
Sternheim et al. (65) AN 30 30 (100%) 24.0 (6.4) 16.0 (2.1) SPSI-R negative problem orientation EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.0001 [-0.38, 0.38]
Brytek-Matera and Schiltz (20) AN, BN 52 52 (100%) 19.6 (2.6) 18.1 (2.5) COPE ED pathology Problem solving difficulties 0.47 [0.19, 0.75]
Fitzsimmons and Bardone-Cone (66) AN, BN, EDNOS 151 151 (100%) 23.6 (4.7) NR CISS task-oriented coping EAT total Problem solving difficulties 0.24 [0.08, 0.41]
Marchiol et al. (67) AN 34 34 (100%) 25.7 (10.6) NR CISS task-oriented coping EDI ED risk Problem solving difficulties 0.03 [-0.33, 0.38]
BN 30 30 (100%) 24.0 (8.4) NR CISS task-oriented coping EDI ED risk Problem solving difficulties 0.34 [-0.04, 0.72]
BED 29 29 (100%) 37.5 (12.7) NR CISS task-oriented coping EDI ED risk Problem solving difficulties 0.14 [-0.24, 0.53]
Spoor et al. (68) AN, BN, BD, EDNOS 125 125 (100%) 29.9 ( 9.2) NR CISS task-oriented coping DEBQ emotional eating Problem solving difficulties 0.14 [-0.04, 0.32]
Nagata et al. (34) AN, BN 161 161 (100%) 22.8 (4.6) 16.5 (2.6) CISS task-oriented coping EDI drive for thinness Problem solving difficulties 0.05 [-0.011, 0.21]
Aloi et al. (21) BED 46 40 (87%) 40.6 (12.7) 38.8 (7.1) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour BES total Problem solving difficulties 0.32 [0.03, 0.62]
Aloi et al. (22) BED 155 86.5% 41.2 (13.2) 37.9 (10.4) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDI total Problem solving difficulties 0.10 [-0.06, 0.26]
Blomquist et al. (23) BED 168 120 (71.4%) 48.3 (10.2) 38.8 (5.7) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour ELOC total Problem solving difficulties 0.41 [0.25, 0.56]
Bodell et al. (24) BN, BED, OSFED 97 89 (91.8%) 38.4 (13.9) 37.2 (11.3) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.15 [-0.10, 0.35]
Brown et al. (25) AN, BN, ARFID, OSFED 364 94.4% 20.9 (9.3) NR DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]
Hazzard et al. (26) BED 112 92 (82.1%) 39.7 (13.4) > 21.0 DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE total Problem solving difficulties 0.21 [0.02, 0.40]
Juarascio et al. (27) AN, BN, ENDOS 120 120 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDQOL total Problem solving difficulties 0.21 [0.03, 0.39]
Kenny et al. (28) BED 71 93% 40.4 (11.4) 37.7 (9.6) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.31 [0.07, 0.55]
Lavender et al. (29) BN 80 72 (90%) 27.3 (9.6) 23.9 (5.5) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE total Problem solving difficulties 0.27 [0.04, 0.49]
MacDonald et al. (30) BN, OSFED 104 93.3% 28.8 (9.0) 24.1 (6.3) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.35 [0.16, 0.55]
MacDonald et al. (31) BN, PD 44 44 (100%) 27.3 (8.4) 24.6 (5.8) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.17 [-0.13, 0.48]
Michael and Juarascio (32) AN, BN, BED 111 111 (100%) 26.7 (9.2) NR DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.32 [0.13, 0.51]
Monell et al. (33) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 999 999 (100%) 24.8 (8.4) 21.5 (5.2) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.24 [0.18, 0.30]
Pisetsky et al. (35) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 110 93.6% 33.5 (12.2) 28.1 (11.2) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.20 [0.01, 0.39]
Racine and Wildes (36) AN 192 183 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE total Problem solving difficulties 0.19 [0.05, 0.33]
Racine and Wildes (37) AN 191 182 (95.3%) 26.5 (10.2) 15.7 (1.8) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE total Problem solving difficulties 0.78 [0.63, 0.92]
Rania et al. (38) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 2405 2303 (95.8%) 22.5 (8.6) 21.7 (6.1) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.33 [0.29, 0.37]
Southward et al. (39) BN, BED 107 107 (100%) 35.2 (12.5) 30.7 (11.1) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE total Problem solving difficulties 0.30 [0.11, 0.49]
Steinglass et al. (40) AN 20 20 (100%) 32.0 (10.4) 15.8 (1.6) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDE restraint Problem solving difficulties 0.51 [0.04, 0.99]
Svaldi et al. (41) AN, BN, BED 63 63 (100%) 30.7 (8.6) 25.4 (4.3) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.50 [0.24, 0.75]
Turan et al. (42) BED 32 18 (57.6%) 15.0 (1.4) 34.6 (3.0) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.01 [-0.35, 0.38]
Wisting et al. (43) AN, BN, BED 272 272 (100%) 29.4 (8.8) 24.3 (8.4) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.27 [0.15, 0.39]
Wolz et al. (44) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 134 121 (90.3%) 28.8 (10.4) 25.0 (9.1) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDI total Problem solving difficulties 0.54 [0.36, 0.71]
Wyssen et al. (45) AN, BN 112 112 (100%) 23.0 (4.3) 19.8 (2.1) DERS difficulties in goal directed behaviour EDEQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.35 [0.16, 0.53]
Svaldi et al. (69) BED 25 25 (100%) 42.8 (10.1) 29.5 (3.9) MEPS effectiveness DEBQ total Problem solving difficulties 0.29 [-0.13, 0.71]
Davies et al. (70) AN, BN, BED, EDNOS 92 92 (100%) 30.2 (9.3) 21.8 (4.0) UCL active problem solving by reassuring thoughts EDI drive for thinness Problem solving difficulties 0.11 [-0.10, 0.32]
Reappraisal
Corstorphine et al. (71) AN, BN, EDNOS 72 72 (100%) 24.5 (7.8) 22.7 (8.7) DTS accept and manage EDI drive for thinness Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.23 [-0.003, 0.47]
Oldershaw et al. (72) AN, EDNOS 40 37 (92.5%) 26.0 (8.8) 16.6 (1.3) DTS accept and manage EDEQ total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.06 [-0.27, 0.38]
Raykos et al. (73) AN, BN, EDNOS 204 204 (100%) 25.8 (9.7) 19.5 (3.1) DTS accept and manage EDEQ total Lack of cognitive reappraisal −0.11 [-0.25, 0.03]
Danner et al. (74) AN restrictive 20 20 (100%) 21.1 (3.2) 17.6 (2.2) ERQ reappraisal EDDS symptomatology Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.04 [-0.44, 0.52]
AN binge-purge, BN 30 30 (100%) 21.7 (2.3) 19.8 (2.2) ERQ reappraisal EDDS total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.34 [-0.03, 0.72]
Danner et al. (75) AN, BN, BED, EDNOS 123 123 (100%) 28.6 (8.4) 23.8 (3.3) ERQ reappraisal EDDS total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.15 [-0.03, 0.33]
Davies et al. (76) AN, BN 103 103 (100%) 26.4 (8.5) 18.1 (4.1) ERQ reappraisal EDEQ total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.29 [0.10, 0.49]
Rothschild-Yakar et al. (77) AN, BN 25 25 (100%) 17.2 (2.8) 20.4 (4.0) ERQ reappraisal EAT total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.28 [-0.14, 0.69]
Svaldi et al. (41) AN, BN, BED 63 63 (100%) 30.7 (8.6) 25.4 (4.3) ERQ reappraisal EDEQ total Lack of cognitive reappraisal 0.24 [-0.01, 0.50]
Avoidance
Butryn et al. (51 ) AN, BN, EDNOS 88 88 (100%) 26.5 (12.2) NR EAQ avoidance of positive emotions EDEQ total Avoidance 0.41 [0.20, 0.62]
Wildes et al. (78) AN 75 74 (98.7%) 26.3 (8.6) 15.8 (1.8) EAQ total EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.39 [0.16, 0.62]
Espel-Huynh et al. (61) AN, BN, EDNOS 531 531 (100%) 25.3 (11.1) NR BEAQ total PMT ED behaviours Avoidance 0.26 [0.17, 0.34]
Espel-Huynh et al. (61) AN, BN, BED, OSFED 625 625 (100%) 25.1 (10.7) NR BEAQ total EDEQ total Avoidance 0.42 [0.35, 0.50]
Scharff et al. (62) AN, BN, OSFED 1042 1042 (100%) 25.3 (10.6) 23.3 (8.9) BEAQ total EDEQ total Avoidance 0.37 [0.31, 0.43]
Waller and Kyriacou Marcoulides (79) AN, BN 102 102 (100%) 26.3 (7.7) 16.4 (1.6) BSBS avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.29 [0.10, 0.49]
Paterson et al. (63) AN 55 55 (100%) 24.6 (6.8) 14.6 (2.2) SPSI-R avoidance style EDEQ total Avoidance 0.35 [0.07, 0.62]
Paterson et al. (64) AN 27 27 (100%) 26.5 (7.9) 18.0 (3.3) SPSI-R avoidance style EAT total Avoidance 0.47 [0.07, 0.87]
Sternheim et al. (65) AN 30 30 (100%) 24.0 (6.4) 16.0 (2.1) SPSI-R avoidance style EDEQ total Avoidance 0.0001 [-0.38, 0.38]
Mason et al. (80) BN, sub-threshold BN 204 204 (100%) 25.7 (8.9) 23.0 (5.3) DAPP-BQ social avoidance EEQ total Avoidance 0.38 [0.24, 0.52]
Thaler et al. (81) AN 55 55 (100%) 23.5 (5.8) 15.2 (5.5) DAPP-BQ social avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.16 [-0.11, 0.43]
Cockell et al. (82) AN, sub-threshold AN 80 80 (100%) 25.3 (8.5) 17.3 (2.3) DB functional avoidance EDI total Avoidance 0.06 [-0.16, 0.28]
Delinsky et al. (83) AN, BN, EDNOS 67 67 (100%) 18.9 (range = 16.0 – 23.0) NR DB functional avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.37 [0.12, 0.61]
Fitzsimmons and Bardone-Cone (66) AN, BN, EDNOS 151 151 (100%) 23.6 (4.7) NR CISS avoidance distraction EAT-26 total Avoidance −0.27 [-0.43,−0.11]
Marchiol et al. (67) AN 34 34 (100%) 25.7 (10.6) NR CISS avoidance distraction EDI ED risk Avoidance −0.27 [-0.62, 0.08]
BN 30 30 (100%) 24.0 (8.4) NR CISS avoidance distraction EDI ED risk Avoidance 0.02 [-0.36, 0.40]
BED 29 29 (100%) 37.5 (12.7) NR CISS avoidance distraction EDI ED risk Avoidance 0.01 [-0.38, 0.39]
Spoor et al. (68) AN, BN, BD, EDNOS 125 125 (100%) 29.9 ( 9.2) NR CISS avoidance distraction DEBQ emotional eating Avoidance 0.46 [0.18, 0.64]
Nagata et al. (34) AN, BN 161 161 (100%) 22.8 (4.6) 16.5 (2.6) CISS avoidance distraction EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.28 [0.12, 0.43]
Brytek-Matera and Schiltz (20) AN, BN 52 52 (100%) 19.6 (2.6) 18.1 (2.5) SVF120 Avoidance ED pathology Avoidance 0.35 [0.07, 0.63]
Rothschild-Yakar et al. (84) AN 41 41 (100%) 17.6 (2.6) 18.0 (1.7) DSI emotional cut-off EAT total Avoidance 0.38 [0.06, 0.69]
Tasca et al. (85) AN, BN, EDNOS 310 310 (100%) 26.3 (8.8) 21.9 (6.2) DSI-R emotional cut-off EDI total Avoidance 0.41 [0.30, 0.52]
Sheffield et al. (86) AN, BN, BED, EDNOS 124 124 (100%) 27.6 (7.8) 21.8 (9.1) YRAI behavioural-somatic avoidance EDI body dissatisfaction Avoidance 0.30 [0.12, 0.48]
Spranger et al. (87) AN, BN, BED 19 19 (100%) 30.8 (10.0) 23.5 (6.9) YRAI total BITE symptoms Avoidance −0.22 [-0.71, 0.27]
Noetel et al. (88) AN 60 50 (100%) 15.0 (1.2) % EBW = 86.6 (12.39) CET avoidance YEDE-Q: restraint Avoidance 0.74 [0.48, 1.00]
Sauchelli et al. (89) AN, BN, EDNOS 157 143 (91.1%) NR 21.5 (5.2) CET avoidance EDI total Avoidance 0.34 [0.18, 0.50]
Torres et al. (55) BED 7 7 (100%) 38.3 (9.3) 34.6 (3.9) EPS avoidance DEBQ total Avoidance 0.38 [-0.60, 1.36]
Bratland-Sanda et al. (90) AN, BN, EDNOS 38 38 (100%) 30.9 (8.9) 21.6 (3.6) REI negative affect avoidance EDE total Avoidance 0.87 [0.54, 1.20]
Marzola, et al. (91) AN 81 81 (100%) 25.3 (8.5) 15.1 (2.2) MANQ avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.17 [-0.05, 0.39]
Meyer et al. (92) AN 13 13 (100%) 27.8 (10.0) 16.8 (2.1) Anagram solution task: avoidance of threat words EDI drive for thinness Avoidance −0.12 [-0.74, 0.50]
BN 37 37 (100%) 25.2 (6.8) 19.4 (1.7) Anagram solution task: avoidance of threat words EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.13 [-0.21, 0.47]
Merwin et al. (93) AN 6 6 (100%) 12 – 18 17.7 (1.7) AFQ-Y EDEQ total Avoidance 0.85 [-0.28, 1.99]
Oldershaw et al. (72) AN, EDNOS 40 37 (92.5%) 26.0 (8.8) 16.6 (1.3) DTS avoidance of affect EDEQ total Avoidance 0.59 [0.27, 0.91]
Corstorphine et al. (71) AN, BN, EDNOS 72 72 (100%) 24.5 (7.8) 22.7 (8.7) DTS avoidance of affect EDI drive for thinness Avoidance −0.10 [-0.34, 0.13]
Lampard et al. (94) AN, BN, EDNOS 257 257 (100%) 26.1 (9.1) 19.8 (2.7) DTS avoidance of affect EDEQ total Avoidance 0.12 [-0.002, 0.24]
Rienecke et al. (95) AN, BN, BED, OSFED, ARFID 613 514 (83.8%) 24.5 (9.8) NR PCL-5 avoidance EPSI restraint Avoidance 0.32 [0.24, 0.40]
Baños et al. (96) AN 66 66 (100%) 28.0 (9.0) 16.7 (1.2) TCI harm avoidance DEBQ restraint Avoidance 0.27 [0.02, 0.52]
Danner et al. (97) AN, recovered AN 45 45 (100%) 25.3 (5.0) 17.9 (1.8) TCI harm avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.45 [0.15, 0.75]
Díaz-Marsá et al. (98) AN, BN 72 72 (100%) 21.5 (4.2) NR TCI harm avoidance BITE total Avoidance 0.58 [0.34, 0.81]
Duffy et al. (99) AN 270 95.2% 28.5 (10.7) 18.7 (2.4) TCI harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.28 [0.16, 0.40]
Frank et al. (100) AN 56 56 (100%) 16.6 (2.5) 15.9 (0.9) TCI harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.40 [0.13, 0.67]
Levinson et al. (101) AN 732 NR 13 – 65 NR TCI harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.23 [0.16, 0.31]
del Pino-Gutiérrez et al. (102) BN 527 93.1% 26.0 (6.6) NR TCI harm avoidance EDI total Avoidance 0.67 [0.58, 0.75]
Paganini et al. (103) AN, BN, OSFED 292 292 (100%) 28.1 (9.7) 24.4 (5.8) TCI harm avoidance EDE total Avoidance 0.18 [0.07, 0.30]
Rotella et al. (104) AN, BN, BED 166 166 (100%) 37.9 (14.4) NR TCI harm avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.21 [0.06, 0.37]
Van Riel et al. (105) BED, sub-threshold BED 198 198 (100%) 40.7 (12.9) 39.7 (6.2) TCI harm avoidance EDEQ total Avoidance 0.20 [0.06, 0.34]
Walden et al. (50) AN, BN, EDNOS 617 (94.6%) 28.0 (10.0) NR TCI harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.23 [0.16, 0.31]
Wierenga et al. (106) Remitted BN 23 23 (100%) 27.2 22.0 TCI harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.39 [-0.05, 0.83]
Solmi et al. (107) AN, BN, BED 2068 96.6% 28.2 (9.3) NR TPQ harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.26 [0.22, 0.30]
Marzola et al. (108) Mixed ED 112 NR 24.8 (8.5) 15.9 (3.7) PCT-Q harm avoidance EDI drive for thinness Avoidance 0.42 [0.24, 0.61]
Rumination
Verschueren et al. (109 ) AN, BN, BED, EDNOS 121 121 (100%) 28.5 (9.9) 22.3 (range = 13.7 – 49.1) DIDS ruminative exploration EDI total Rumination 0.20 [0.02, 0.38]
Wang et al. (110) BED 237 167 (70.5%) 47.9 (10.0) 39.5 (5.9) RRS brooding rumination EDEQ total Rumination 0.37 [0.24, 0.50]
Sagiv and Gvion (111) AN, BN, OSFED 91 91 (100%) 24.0 (5.5) 19.4 (5.3) RRS total EDEQ binge eating Rumination 0.13 [-0.08, 0.34]
Wang and Borders (112) AN, BN, OSFED 85 87.1% 24.6 (10.0) NR RRS total EDEQ total Rumination 0.51 [0.29, 0.73]
Thew et al. (113) Mixed ED 26 NR > 18 NR RRQ total EDEQ total Rumination 0.38 [-0.02, 0.79]
Cowdrey and Park (46) AN 42 42 (100%) 24.0 (8.3) 19.6 (2.5) RSS-ED brooding rumination EDEQ total Rumination 0.97 [0.66, 1.29]
Seidel et al. (114) AN 37 37 (100%) 16.4 (2.3) 14.6 (1.3) PTQ perseverative thinking EDI total Rumination 1.03 [0.70, 1.37]
Suppression
Oldershaw et al. (72) AN, EDNOS 40 37 (92.5%) 26.0 (8.8) 16.6 (1.3) STSS silencing the self EDEQ total Suppression 0.34 [0.02, 0.67]
Overton et al. (115) AN, BN 32 32 (100%) 28.1 (10.3) 21.5 (6.5) YSQ emotional inhibition EDI drive for thinness Suppression 0.17 [-0.19, 0.54]
Torres et al. (55) BED 7 7 (100%) 38.3 (9.3) 34.6 (3.9) EPS suppression DEBQ total Suppression 0.76 [-0.22, 1.74]
Cardi et al. (116) AN, BN, EDNOS 65 65 (100%) 25.8 (8.1) 18.9 (2.1) Evoked facial affect EDEQ total Suppression 0.05 [-0.20, 0.30]
Davies et al. (117) AN 30 30 (100%) 24.5 (range = 19.0 – 33.3) 14.6 (range = 12.9 – 15.6) Evoked facial affect EDEQ total Suppression 0.46 [0.08, 0.84]
Dapelo et al. (118) AN, BN 40 40 (100%) 27.9 (8.4) 18.9 (2.5) Evoked facial affect EDEQ total Suppression 0.10 [-0.22, 0.42]
Lang et al. (119) AN 66 66 (100%) 20.1 (7.3) 15.4 (1.4) Evoked facial affect EDEQ total Suppression 0.36 [0.11, 0.61]
Leppanen et al. (120) AN 29 29 (100%) 26.2 (7.1) 16.3 (2.1) Evoked facial effect EDEQ total Suppression −0.09 [-0.05, 0.29]
Krug et al. (121) AN, BN, EDNOS 135 135 (100%) 25.6 (6.7) 21.9 (15.1) STAXI-2 anger expression (out) EDI total Suppression 0.53 [0.36, 0.70]
Fassino et al. (122) BED 51 51 (100%) 34.5 (8.9) 36.5 (6.3) STAXI-2 anger expression (out) EDI drive for thinness Suppression 0.22 [-0.06, 0.51]
Danner et al. (75) AN, BN, BED, EDNOS 123 123 (100%) 28.6 (8.4) 23.8 (3.3) ERQ suppression EDDS total Suppression 0.08 [-0.10, 0.26]
Davies et al. (76) AN, BN 103 103 (100%) 26.4 (8.5) 18.1 (4.1) ERQ suppression EDEQ total Suppression 0.47 [0.28, 0.67]
Rothschild-Yakar et al. (77) AN, BN 25 25 (100%) 17.2 (2.8) 20.4 (4.0) ERQ suppression EAT total Suppression 0.19 [-0.23, 0.61]
Svaldi et al. (41) AN, BN, BED 63 63 (100%) 30.7 (8.6) 25.4 (4.3) ERQ suppression EDEQ total Suppression 0.51 [0.26, 0.76]