| Yu 2021 |
Low risk of bias |
Participants were randomised via web‐based Sortition and the allocation sequence was intimated to GP and patient via email/letter. There are no baseline differences that would suggest a problem with randomisation |
Low risk of bias |
We judged risk of bias low because there were no reported deviations from intended interventions. |
Low risk of bias |
We judged this domain low because it is not likely that missingness in the outcome depended on its true value. There were about 5% of the participants without a diary entry. |
High risk of bias |
We judged this domain high because it is likely that the knowledge of the intervention has influenced the subjective self‐assessment of this outcome. |
Low risk of bias |
The data were in accordance with the protocol, so that we assessed domain 5 low. |
High risk of bias |
Overall judged high risk of bias due to measurement of the outcome. |
