Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;8:58. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01017-z

Table 5.

Process evaluation with data collection time-points

Implementation outcome Measurement Dressing change time point Source of data (measurement tool) Assessor Dressing change
Pre Mid Post
Reach Rate of families willing to participate out of those approached for participation x Report Hypnotherapist 1st dressing change
Acceptability Parents’ and children’s beliefs/views on hypnotherapy x Field notes, semi-structured pre-hypnosis interviewa
Children’s level of perceived self-efficacy x 1–10 Likert scale
Children’s level of positive therapy expectations x 1–10 Likert scale
Satisfaction of parents and children with suggestibility screening, involuntariness measures, and pre-hypnosis interview x Satisfaction NRSb
Satisfaction of parents, children, and clinicians with the hypnotherapeutic session x Satisfaction NRSb Each dressing change
Families’ and clinicians’ likes, dislikes, recommendations, and perceived burden of required time and effort regarding hypnotherapeutic sessions x Semi-structured interviewa and field notes Last dressing change
Satisfaction of families with health outcomes measurements x Satisfaction NRSb
Effectiveness Perceived benefits x Field notes, reports of children, parents, and clinicians
Safety of hypnotherapy (rate, timing, duration, and severity of adverse events) x x Each dressing change
Health outcomes (Refer to Table 6 for details)
Adoption Rate of clinicians consenting to participate among those conducting dressing changes. x Report Hypnotherapist 1st dressing change
Implementation: fidelity Retention rate x x Report on the rate of children completing the intervention Each dressing change
Fidelity in collecting data on health outcomes x Response rate in data collection forms (amount and type of missing data)
Fidelity in delivering the intervention x Study-specific checklistc Independent observer expert in clinical hypnosis
Additional adaptations and modifications x Documentation of what, when, and how adaptations occurred
Feasibility

- Adequacy of resources (adequately working music player, calm space)

- Presence/absence of interruption (s)

- Time availability (sufficient for delivering study procedures) [31]

x x x

- Field notes

- Intervention pre-recording

Hypnotherapist

aFollowing permission from children and parents to audiotape the intervention

bAdult participants (parents or clinicians) and children ≥ 8years will self-report their satisfaction; proxy reports will be obtained from parents for children < 8years

cAn independent assessor (preferably hypnotherapist) will assess the fidelity of delivering the intervention through analysing pre-recordings using a study-specific checklist based on the intervention manual; % of core elements and non-core elements delivered will be reported