Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;9:808417. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.808417

Table 3.

Metabolic and hepatic parameters of the study population.

Features NLP OSA p-value
Frequency, n (%) 43 (21.9) 153 (78.1) NA
Body mass index ≥ 30, n (%) 13 (30.2) 68 (44.4) 0.095
HOMA-IR score ≥ 3, n (%) 14 (32.6) 93 (60.8) 0.001
Type 2 diabetes mellitus, n (%) 4 (9.3) 25 (16.3) 0.334
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 10 (23.3) 74 (48.4) 0.003
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 4 (9.3) 33 (21.6) 0.080
Hepatic steatosis
by Fatty Liver Index ≥ 60, n (%) 15 (34.9) 95 (62.1) 0.001
by Hepatic Steatosis Index ≥ 36, n (%) 21 (48.8) 104 (68) 0.021
NASH by OWLiver test, n (%) 12 (27.9) 77 (50.3) 0.009
Low risk of advanced fibrosis
FIB-4 <1.3, n (%) 24 (55.8) 94 (61.4) 0.416
NFS < −1.455, n (%) 21 (48.8) 64 (41.8) 0.413
HFS <0.12, n (%) 35 (81.4) 121 (79.1) 0.833
High risk of advanced fibrosis
FIB-4 > 3.25, n (%) 0 (0) 2 (1.3) 1.000
NFS > 0.675, n (%) 1 (2.3) 10 (6.5) 0.461
HFS ≥ 0.47, n (%) 1 (2.3) 4 (2.6) 1.000

Data are shown as mean ± SD or as number of cases (%). NLP, subjects with normal lung parameters; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; NA, not applicable; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance; NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score; HFS, Hepamet fibrosis score. Bold values are the statistically significant.