Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;12:3831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07510-y

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a Bland–Altman analysis of 2D CVI (Subfoveal) versus 3D CVI (Whole Macula). This is a plot of the difference [2D CVI (Subfoveal) –- 3D CVI (Whole Macula) versus the mean of the two measurements). b Bland–Altman analysis of 2D CVI (Subfoveal) versus 3D CVI (Superior Macula). This is a plot of the difference [2D CVI (Subfoveal)—3D CVI (Superior Macula) versus the mean of the two measurements). c Bland–Altman analysis of 2D CVI (Subfoveal) versus 3D CVI (Central Macula). This is a plot of the difference [2D CVI (Subfoveal) – 3D CVI (Central Macula) versus the mean of the two measurements). d Bland–Altman analysis of 2D CVI (Subfoveal) versus 3D CVI (Inferior Macula). This is a plot of the difference [2D CVI (Subfoveal) – 3D CVI (Inferior Macula) versus the mean of the two measurements). The solid black line represent the mean differences and the interrupted red lines represent the 95% limits of agreement.