. 2022 Mar 9;12:3831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07510-y

Table 3.

Agreement between 2D CVI (Subfoveal) and 3D CVI (Whole, Superior, Central, and Inferior Macula).

	ICC (95% CI)	Bland–Altman		F-test in equality of variance (P)*
	ICC (95% CI)	95% Limits of agreement, %	Mean difference, % (95% CI)	F-test in equality of variance (P)*
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Whole Macula)	0.591 (0.365, 0.749)	−2.55, 3.76	0.61 (0.15, 1.07)	0.049
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Superior Macula)	0.483 (0.234, 0.671)	−3.11, 4.66	0.78 (0.21, 1.34	0.600
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Central Macula)	0.719 (0.554, 0.830)	−2.63, 3.00	0.18 (−0.22, 0.59)	0.179
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Inferior Macula)	0.394 (0.134, 0.604)	−3.10, 4.85	0.87 (0.30, 1.45)	0.153

ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient: CI: confidence interval. * Statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.