Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;12:3872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07604-7

Table 3.

Six-month outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema treated by DEX implants.

Values p-valuea
No. of eyes 67
DEX implant number mean ± SD 2.0 ± 0.8
CFT, mean ± SD, µm  < 0.001
Baseline 459.9 ± 146.3
6-moa 360.5 ± 127.4
CFT change at 6-mob
Decreased 10% or more from baseline 35 (52)
Decreased to < 300 µm 16 (24)
BCVA, mean ± SD, logMAR 0.35
Baseline 0.80 ± 0.37
6-moc 0.79 ± 0.49
BCVA change at 6-mo
Improved 15 ETDRS letters or more 15 (22)
Decreased 15 ETDRS letters or more 8 (12)
Stable 38 (57)
Missing 6 (9)
Lens status, phakic, No. (%) 1.0
Baseline 22 (33)
6-moc 22 (33)
Cataract progression 4 (6)
IOP, mean ± SD, mmHg 0.003
Baseline 14.2 ± 3.7
6-moc 17.7 ± 5.1
Elevated IOPb, No. (%)
 > 25 mmHg 5 (9)
 > 35 mmHg 2 (3)
Uncontrolled glaucoma needing intervention, No. (%) 2 (3)d

aBetween the baseline and the 6-mo values.

bValid n = 58.

cValid n = 61.

dTwo eyes from the same patient with persistent elevated IOP and needed argon laser trabeculoplasty.

Abbreviation: BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, CFT central foveal thickness, DEX implant dexamethasone intravitreal implant, IOP intraocular pressure, logMAR logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.