Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;10:816317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816317

Table 3.

The criteria for expert scoring.

Dimension Criteria for evaluation Grading scale
Physical environment • Street greening and sky view
• Accessibility of transportation facilities
• Road network accessibility
• Diversity and convenience of public service facilities
• Activity population density
• Building density in the surrounding area.
5-Excellent (Very strong advantages with negligible weaknesses)
4-Good (Strong advantages with minor weaknesses)
3-Average (Streets have some strengths but moderate weaknesses)
Pedestrian perception • Concentration degree of walking and riding people.
• Completeness of physical warning and monitoring facilities.
• Degree of motor vehicle interference.
• Availability of historical and cultural facilities within a 15-minute walk.
• Visibility of mountains, water bodies, and historical and cultural buildings.
2-Weak (Streets have few strengths with major weaknesses)
1-Poor (Streets have very few strengths with numerous major weaknesses)