Table 3.
The criteria for expert scoring.
| Dimension | Criteria for evaluation | Grading scale |
|---|---|---|
| Physical environment | • Street greening and sky view • Accessibility of transportation facilities • Road network accessibility • Diversity and convenience of public service facilities • Activity population density • Building density in the surrounding area. |
5-Excellent (Very strong advantages with negligible weaknesses) 4-Good (Strong advantages with minor weaknesses) 3-Average (Streets have some strengths but moderate weaknesses) |
| Pedestrian perception | • Concentration degree of walking and riding people. • Completeness of physical warning and monitoring facilities. • Degree of motor vehicle interference. • Availability of historical and cultural facilities within a 15-minute walk. • Visibility of mountains, water bodies, and historical and cultural buildings. |
2-Weak (Streets have few strengths with major weaknesses) 1-Poor (Streets have very few strengths with numerous major weaknesses) |