Table 1.
Three-fold cross-validation performance of unimodal prediction models using radiomics and our proposed MMIDFNet.
| Methods | Modality | Fold | ACC | AUC | SEN | SPE | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiomics | T1 | 1 | 0.730 | 0.734 | 0.546 | 0.792 | 0.807 | 0.865 |
| 2 | 0.689 | 0.755 | 0.522 | 0.765 | 0.748 | 0.844 | ||
| 3 | 0.699 | 0.737 | 0.610 | 0.792 | 0.682 | 0.812 | ||
| Average | 0.706 | 0.742 | 0.559 | 0.783 | 0.746 | 0.840 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.672, 0.740] | [0.724, 0.760] | [0.487, 0.632] | [0.758, 0.808] | [0.646, 0.846] | [0.798, 0.883] | ||
| T2 | 1 | 0.703 | 0.775 | 0.554 | 0.787 | 0.657 | 0.824 | |
| 2 | 0.743 | 0.827 | 0.596 | 0.816 | 0.722 | 0.875 | ||
| 3 | 0.712 | 0.712 | 0.560 | 0.820 | 0.615 | 0.843 | ||
| Average | 0.719 | 0.771 | 0.570 | 0.808 | 0.665 | 0.847 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.686, 0.753] | [0.679, 0.863] | [0.534, 0.606] | [0.779, 0.836] | [0.578, 0.751] | [0.806, 0.889] | ||
| T1ce | 1 | 0.838 | 0.908 | 0.706 | 0.890 | 0.867 | 0.928 | |
| 2 | 0.784 | 0.841 | 0.650 | 0.854 | 0.770 | 0.905 | ||
| 3 | 0.822 | 0.856 | 0.756 | 0.903 | 0.752 | 0.902 | ||
| Average | 0.815 | 0.868 | 0.704 | 0.882 | 0.796 | 0.912 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.770, 0.859] | [0.812, 0.925] | [0.619, 0.789] | [0.842, 0.923] | [0.697, 0.895] | [0.889, 0.934] | ||
| Flair | 1 | 0.730 | 0.788 | 0.570 | 0.792 | 0.763 | 0.881 | |
| 2 | 0.685 | 0.718 | 0.557 | 0.787 | 0.625 | 0.813 | ||
| 3 | 0.743 | 0.740 | 0.585 | 0.810 | 0.756 | 0.888 | ||
| Average | 0.719 | 0.749 | 0.571 | 0.796 | 0.715 | 0.861 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.671, 0.768] | [0.691, 0.806] | [0.548, 0.593] | [0.777, 0.816] | [0.590, 0.839] | [0.794, 0.927] | ||
| MMIDFNet | T1 | 1 | 0.757 | 0.724 | 0.572 | 0.821 | 0.813 | 0.894 |
| 2 | 0.689 | 0.696 | 0.509 | 0.767 | 0.663 | 0.890 | ||
| 3 | 0.712 | 0.780 | 0.516 | 0.777 | 0.701 | 0.873 | ||
| Average | 0.719 | 0.733 | 0.532 | 0.788 | 0.726 | 0.886 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.664, 0.775] | [0.665, 0.802] | [0.477, 0.588] | [0.742, 0.834] | [0.601, 0.850] | [0.868, 0.904] | ||
| T2 | 1 | 0.743 | 0.835 | 0.542 | 0.794 | 0.742 | 0.907 | |
| 2 | 0.730 | 0.749 | 0.560 | 0.820 | 0.687 | 0.854 | ||
| 3 | 0.726 | 0.788 | 0.591 | 0.822 | 0.642 | 0.853 | ||
| Average | 0.733 | 0.791 | 0.564 | 0.812 | 0.690 | 0.871 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.719, 0.747] | [0.722, 0.860] | [0.525, 0.604] | [0.787, 0.837] | [0.610, 0.770] | [0.822, 0.921] | ||
| T1ce | 1 | 0.838 | 0.907 | 0.764 | 0.885 | 0.842 | 0.909 | |
| 2 | 0.824 | 0.885 | 0.667 | 0.897 | 0.749 | 0.934 | ||
| 3 | 0.836 | 0.883 | 0.694 | 0.900 | 0.859 | 0.929 | ||
| Average | 0.833 | 0.892 | 0.708 | 0.894 | 0.817 | 0.924 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.821, 0.845] | [0.870, 0.913] | [0.628, 0.788] | [0.881, 0.907] | [0.722, 0.911] | [0.903, 0.945] | ||
| Flair | 1 | 0.770 | 0.782 | 0.669 | 0.855 | 0.755 | 0.866 | |
| 2 | 0.703 | 0.750 | 0.537 | 0.767 | 0.813 | 0.896 | ||
| 3 | 0.753 | 0.752 | 0.640 | 0.852 | 0.673 | 0.869 | ||
| Average | 0.742 | 0.761 | 0.615 | 0.825 | 0.747 | 0.877 | ||
| 95% CI | [0.686, 0.798] | [0.733, 0.790] | [0.504, 0.726] | [0.745, 0.905] | [0.634, 0.860] | [0.851, 0.903] |
ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval; Bold Value, average value of 3 folds.