Table 2.

Multivariate analysis for the relationship between TG/HDL-C ratio and incident T2DM.

	Hazard Ratio and 95% CI
	Crude model	Model I	Model II	Model III
TG/HDL-C	1.29 (1.14, 1.47) <0.01	1.21 (1.06, 1.38) 0.01	1.17 (1.02, 1.34) 0.03	1.18 (1.03, 1.35) 0.02
TG/HDL-C quintiles
Q1	1	1	1	1
Q2	1.35 (0.85, 2.17) 0.21	1.27 (0.797, 2.03) 0.32	1.24 (0.77, 1.99) 0.37	1.2 (0.75, 1.92) 0.46
Q3	1.31 (0.83, 2.06) 0.25	1.15 (0.73, 1.83) 0.55	1.10 (0.69, 1.75) 0.69	1.06 (0.66, 1.68) 0.82
Q4	1.85 (1.20, 2.85) 0.01	1.61 (1.04, 2.50) 0.03	1.56 (1.01, 2.42) 0.04	1.5 (0.96, 2.32) 0.07
Q5	2.10 (1.38, 3.20) < 0.01	1.72 (1.11, 2.65) 0.01	1.59 (1.02, 2.47) 0.05	1.52 (0.99, 2.35) 0.05
P for trend	<0.01	0.01	0.02	0.02