Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;10:852318. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.852318

TABLE 1.

Comparison of in vitro compression devices.

Methods of force application Weight of the piston on the top Tse et al. (2012) Weight of the cube filled with iron ball bearings Kim et al. (2017) Weight of the piston on the top Kalli et al. (2019) Cylindrical weight on the top Morikura and Miyata (2019) Cylindrical weight on the top Morikura and Miyata (2021) Air pressure applied via a bioreactor device Novak et al. (2020) Weight of gels on the top [this work]
Compression force 5.8 mmHg 5.8 mmHg (∼0.773 kPa) 4 mmHg 0.77 kPa 0.77 kPa 3.9–6.5 kPa dynamically 0.08–0.24 mmHg
Compression force applied duration 16 h 24 h 16 h 8 and 32 h a cycle of 4 h on/4 h off 24 and 72 h 1, 2, 4, and 24 h
Cell types Breast cancer cells Breast cancer cells Brain cancer cells Melanoma cells Melanoma cells Ovarian cancer cells Breast cancer cells
Cell culture condition Cells sandwiched between gels Cells embedded in agarose Spheroids embedded in agarose Cells embedded in collagen Cells embedded in collagen Cells embedded in agarose/collagen Cells sandwiched between gels
Real-time observation No No No Yes Yes No Yes
Single cell resolution No No No No mentioned No mentioned No Yes
Hydrogel digest for cell harvest Not required Required Required Required Required Required Not required