Table 2.
Persuasive technology classification scheme by Orji and Moffatt [6].
| Factor | Identification | Description |
| 1 | Targeted (health) domain | Outcome changes for physical activity, healthy eating, medical issues, sleep, and hydration |
| 2 | Technology platform | Persuasive technology platform integrated web, mobile phone, weight scales, wearables, sensors, and watches |
| 3 | Duration of evaluation | Hours, days, weeks, months, and 2 years (a few people) |
| 4 | Behavior theories | Social cognitive theories with confidence and ability to do work tasks, goal-setting theory with interventions, self-management theory, performance evaluation theories, and processes improvement change theories |
| 5 | Motivation strategies | SMARTa goals, professional protocols, and intervention strategies; start anywhere, make changes for life, and any improvement matters |
| 6 | Evaluation method | Mixed methods comparing qualitative text-based, quantitative small sample size, log analysis, website feature use, and interviews |
| 7 | Targeted age group | ≥18 years |
| 8 | Number of participants | 8 fire stations with 141 people |
| 9 | Study country | East Coast, Canada |
| 10 | Targeted behavioral or psychological outcome | Integration of social cognitive abilities, behaviors, attitudes, adherence, mentoring behaviors, and social interactions |
| 11 | Findings or results | Whether successful overall and smaller changes during the paths that the users took |
aSMART: specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound.