Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;16:831533. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.831533

TABLE 3.

Results of the ablation studies of BP module and metric learning losses for NC VS. AD classification (Mean ± Standard Deviation).

Method ACC (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) AUC F1 (%) p
Baseline 85.25 ± 2.50 92.01 ± 2.82 76.33 ± 6.77 83.91 ± 3.96 87.99 ± 3.52 0.9074 ± 0.0215 87.77 ± 1.96
Baseline + BP 88.94 ± 1.20 93.52 ± 3.48 82.79 ± 3.50 87.92 ± 1.77 90.93 ± 4.33 0.9286 ± 0.0218 90.63 ± 1.22 0.051
Tri-loss 88.29 ± 0.86 93.54 ± 0.99 81.33 ± 2.04 86.92 ± 1.44 90.47 ± 1.31 0.9279 ± 0.0127 90.35 ± 0.74 0.059
Tri-loss + BP 89.80 ± 0.62 93.53 ± 3.70 84.81 ± 4.88 89.28 ± 2.79 91.20 ± 4.28 0.9281 ± 0.0192 91.11 ± 0.70 0.032*
Con-loss 89.14 ± 1.75 93.53 ± 2.56 83.35 ± 2.78 88.02 ± 1.59 90.76 ± 3.54 0.9281 ± 0.0253 90.69 ± 1.48 0.088
Con-loss + BP 89.80 ± 0.99 93.90 ± 2.44 84.32 ± 3.40 88.91 ± 2.00 91.40 ± 2.97 0.9334 ± 0.0141 91.35 ± 0.80 0.029*

The bold values represent the highest number.

The asterisk represents the results have the statistical significance.