Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;7(9):8046–8059. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07209

Table 2. Comparison between the Antimicrobial Efficiency of Ag@Biochar Prepared in the Current Study and AgNPs and AgNP Nanocomposites Prepared in Other Studies.

sample sample concentration (mg mL–1) bacterial strain zone of inhibition (mm) references
chitosan–silver nanoparticles (CS–AgNPs) 1 Escherichia coli 10 (78)
methanol silver nanoparticles (SNPs) 100 Staphylococcus aureus 14.33 (79)
    Escherichia coli 10.33  
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 13.67  
    Staphylococcus aureus 12.6  
    Staphylococcus aureus 13  
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 16  
AgNP-embedded guar gum/gelatin nanocomposite   Escherichia coli 12.5 (80)
    Staphylococcus aureus 13  
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12.5  
Ag/GO nanocomposite 1 Staphylococcus aureus 15 (81)
    Escherichia coli 19  
copper–silver–titanium oxide nanocomposite (Cu–Ag–TiO2) 0.5 Staphylococcus aureus 21 (82)
    Escherichia coli 16  
    Escherichia coli 16  
    Escherichia coli 9.3  
Ag@biochar 1 Escherichia coli no growth (sensitive) this study
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 19  
    Klebsiella pneumoniae 18  
    Bacillus subtilis 22  
    Staphylococcus aureus resistant  
    Candida albicans 16