. 2022 Mar 10;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01237-8

Table 1.

Runtime and memory comparison on CAMI I Medium and High Complexity datasets. All programs were run on a workstation with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4108 CPU @ 1.80 GHz (16 threads in total), a NVIDIA Tesla K80 GPU and 96 GB memory. All programs were run with all threads and with their default parameters except for setting the minimum contig length to 2.5 Kb

Runtime memory	MetaDecoder	CONCOCT (version 1.0.0)	MaxBin2 (version 2.2.4)	MetBAT2 (version 2.12.1)	VAMB (version 3.0.2)
CAMI I Medium	5 m 11 s, 0.9 GB 2 min 7 s, 0.9 GB^a	9 min 7 s, 0.7 GB	133 min 3 s, 0.8 GB	6 min 4 s, 0.8 GB	17 min 34 s, 0.5 GB 8 min 22 s, 0.5 GB^a
CAMI I High	17 min 38 s, 2.6 GB 4 min 2 s, 2.6 GB^a	19 min 25 s, 1.1 GB	331 min 8 s, 1.7 GB	13 min 36 s, 1.5 GB	31 min 18 s, 1.7 GB 14 min 0 s, 1.7 GB^a

Runtime memory

MetaDecoder

CONCOCT (version 1.0.0)

MaxBin2 (version 2.2.4)

MetBAT2 (version 2.12.1)

VAMB (version 3.0.2)

CAMI I Medium

5 m 11 s, 0.9 GB

2 min 7 s, 0.9 GB^a

9 min 7 s, 0.7 GB

133 min 3 s, 0.8 GB

6 min 4 s, 0.8 GB

17 min 34 s, 0.5 GB

8 min 22 s, 0.5 GB^a

CAMI I High

17 min 38 s, 2.6 GB

4 min 2 s, 2.6 GB^a

19 min 25 s, 1.1 GB

331 min 8 s, 1.7 GB

13 min 36 s, 1.5 GB

31 min 18 s, 1.7 GB

14 min 0 s, 1.7 GB^a

Note: ^aRun with GPU acceleration