Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;22:14. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00452-8

Table 3.

Comparison of diagnostic parameters for predicting risk types

Variable ET model DP model MVD
Ktrans Vp Kep F Vp PS
AUC 0.92 (0.86–0.98) 0.71 (0.62–0.81) 0.85 (0.77–0.92) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.81 (0.73–0.90) 0.77 (0.68–0.87) 0.79 (0.70–0.87)

Accuracy

(%)

90 69 78 88 76 76 76
Sensitivity (%) 94 63 74 87 77 72 65
Specificity (%) 87 74 83 89 75 81 82

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence interval range

ET extended Tofts, DP distributed parameter, Ktrans transfer constant, Kep efflux rate constant, Vp blood volume, F blood flow, PS permeability surface area product, MVD microvessel density. Ktrans and Kep are in units of min−1, Vp is in units of mL/100 mL, F and PS are in units of mL/min/100 mL, MVD are in units of microvessels per mm2. AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve