Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 27;14(5):1235. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051235

Table 3.

Clinical trials of PARP inhibitors as maintenance in the front-line setting.

Study Phase Population Study Arm Control Arm Results
SOLO-1
NCT01844986
III HGSOC/endometrioid (or FP/PPC)
FIGO III–IV
BRCAm
CR/PR platinum-based chemotherapy
Olaparib 300 mg BID Placebo PFS NR vs. 13.8 m
HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.23–0.41)
PRIMA
NCT02655016
III HGSOC/endometrioid (or FP/PPC)
FIGO III–IV
Regardless of BRCA status
CR/PR platinum-based chemotherapy
Niraparib 300 mg daily Placebo ITT
PFS 13.8 vs. 8.2 m
HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.50–0.76)
HRD
PFS 21.9 vs. 10.4 m
HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.31–0.59)
BRCAmut
0.40 (95% CI, 0.27–0.62)
PAOLA-1
NCT02477644
III HGSOC/endometrioid/other epithelial non-mucinous (or FP/PPC)
FIGO IIIB, IIIC or IV
gBRCAm/BRCAwt if HGS
CR/PR platinum-based chemotherapy
Olaparib 300 mg BID + bevacizumab 15 mg/kg/3 wks Placebo + Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg/3 wks ITT
PFS 22.1 vs. 16.6 m
HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49–0.72)
BRCAmut
HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.20–0.47)
VELIA
NCT02470585
III HGSOC OC (or FP/PPC)
FIGO III–IV
Paclitaxel-carboplatin-veliparib (150 mg BID-2 weeks 400 mg BID) → veliparib Paclitaxel-carboplatin-placebo → placebo ITT
PFS: 23.5 vs. 17.3 m
HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.56–0.83)
BRCAmut
PFS: 34.7 vs. 22 m
HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.28–0.68)