Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;14(5):1180. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051180

Table 4.

Secondary chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent uLMS (phase 2 trial).

Regimen Year Patients (n) LMS (n) uLMS (n) ORR (%) mPFS (Months) mOS (Months)
PTX [39] 2003 48 48 48 8.4 NA NA
GEM [40] 2004 42 42 42 20.5 NA NA
GD [30] 2008 48 48 48 27 * 6.7 14.7
GEM vs. GD [29] 2012 90 90 46 ** 19 vs. 24 5.5 vs. 4.7 NA
Ixabepilone [41] 2014 23 23 23 0 1.4 NA
Letrozole [31] 2014 27 27 27 0 3 (PFS-12W 50% *) NA
Nivolumab [32] 2017 12 12 12 0 1.8 NA
Alisertib [33] 2017 23 23 23 0 1.7 14.5
Trabectedin [42] 2018 168 168 168 23.5 4.1 (PFS-6M 35.2% *) 20.6
Thalidomide [43] 2007 29 29 29 0 1.9 8.3
Sunitinib [34] 2009 23 23 23 8.7 1.54 15.1

* Superior to the alternative rate of primary end point in the trial. ** An independent randomized phase 2 trial for uterine leiomyosarcoma and nonuterine leiomyosarcoma. uLMS, uterine leiomyosarcoma; n, number; LMS, leiomyosarcoma; ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival; NA, not available; PTX, paclitaxel; GEM, gemcitabine; GD, gemcitabine + docetaxel, PFS-12W, progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks after study entry; PFS-6M, progression-free survival rate at 6 months after study entry.