Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052641

Table A3.

Description of studies of the perception of traffic safety for children’s active travel.

Study Location Walking or/and Cycling Outcome (of Perception of Safety) Perception Given by Participants Data Source Year of Data Study Design
Basbas, S. et al., 2009 [54] Municipality of Kalamaria, Thessaloniki, and Larissa, Greece Walking and cycling Unsafe/safe to walk and cycle Children (students) Age: 11–12 years (sixth grade school)
School level: 9 Elementary school
Data from survey; no GIS 2001 Cross-sectional
Christie, N. et al., 2007 [51] 10 low socioeconomic areas, UK Walking and cycling Perceived risk of traffic injuries Parents Age: 10 to 14 years Focus groups The project started in 2004
Guliani, A. et al., 2014 [49] Toronto, Canada Walking Danger to walk Parents (mostly mothers) Age: 10 and 11 years (average age 10.58) (720 students, grades 5 and 6) (52% girls and 47.5% boys)
School level: 16 publics school (8 inner-urban, and 8 inner-suburban)
Survey (the project BEAT) April 2010–June 2011 Cross-sectional
Hopkins, D. and S. Mandic, 2017 [53] Dunedin, South Island, New Zealand Cycling Traffic danger to cycling Parents and children students 6 parental focus groups (total = 25 participants), 10 student focus groups (total = 54 students), 5 co-educational schools, 5 single-sex schools (3 girls’ schools, 2 boys’ schools)
School level: high school
Online interview focus group discussions June 2014–April 2015 Cross-sectional
Lee, G. et al., 2016 [6] Ulsan, Korea Walking Safety concern to walk (related with crash risk) Child (students) Age: 10–12 (53.9% boys); 799 children
School level: 8 elementary school
Perception from questionnaire was distributed in the classroom
Crash data from police report for crash
July 2015 Cross-sectional
Napier, M.A. et al., 2011 [68] University of Utah, USA Walking Traffic unsafe to walk Parents and children Age: 10–11 year (n = 193); parents (n = 177)
School level: elementary school
Survey (questionnaire was distributed in classroom); GIS measures Spring 2007 Cross-sectional
Olvera, N. et al., 2012 [52] East End district, East side of Houston, Texas, USA Walking and cycling Safety concern related to walking and cycling Children and mothers Age: 3rd to 5th grade; 132 children (55 boys and 77 girls) average age 10 years and; 102 mothers (mean age = 36.2 ± 77.3)
School level: elementary schools
Self-reported surveys 2008–2009 Cross-sectional
Pocock, T. et al., 2019 [57] Dunedin (New Zealand) Walking and bicycling Concern’s (traffic danger, unsafe) to walking and bicycling Adolescents’ (students) Age: 15.2 ± 1.4 years;
data from 471 adolescents; 56.3% female
School level: secondary schools
Online survey using GIS 2014–2015 Cross-sectional
Rahman, M.L. et al., 2020 [72] Otago, New Zealand Walking and cycling Safety concerns Children Age: 15.2 ± 1.4 years
School level: 23 high schools
Online survey 2014 and 2018
Rothman, L. et al., 2015 [50] Toronto, Canada Walking Traffic danger to walk collision rates Parents Age: 9–11 years (grades 4–6); final sample of parents n = 733 parent surveys
School level: 20 elementary (primary school) schools
Data from parents survey (a written questionnaire); no GIS 2011 Cross-sectional
Soori, H. 2000 [58] Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Walking and cycling Perceived risk (safe/unsafe) Parents and children Age: 7 and 9 years
Participants: children = 471; parents = 416
School level: nine primary school
Surveys (self-completed) Cross-sectional
Torres, J. et al., 2020 [55] Quebec, Canada Walking and cycling Safe/unsafe to walk or cycle Children Age: 11 to 12 years Focus groups 2014–2015 Cross-sectional
Wilson, K. et al., 2019 [56] Southwestern Ontario, Canada Walking and cycling Safe/unsafe to walk or cycle Children Age: 10 to 12 years
Total of 158 students
Focus groups