Table 4.
b (95% CI) 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Female (n = 170) |
Male (n = 74) |
High Social Support (n = 120) |
Lower Social Support (n = 119) |
|
Perceived collective efficacy | --- | --- | 0.06 ** (0.03, 0.09) |
−0.08 (−0.27, 0.12) |
Neighborhood walk score | 0.02 (−0.01, 0.05) |
−0.05 * (−0.11, 0.00) |
0.03 ** (0.02, 0.04) |
0.05 ** (0.01, 0.09) |
Neighborhood total crime rate | --- | --- | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.01) |
−0.02 (−0.01, 0.01) |
Neighborhood homicide rate | 0.01 (−0.46, 0.48) |
−0.28 (−1.00, 0.44) |
1.85 ** (0.36, 3.34) |
−0.16 (−0.72, 0.41) |
Neighborhood assault rate | --- | --- | −0.15 ** (−0.19, −0.12) |
0.23 ** (0.09, 0.37) |
Neighborhood onsite alcohol density | --- | --- | 0.43 ** (0.34, 0.51) |
0.02 (−0.41, 0.45) |
Neighborhood offsite alcohol density | 0.11 (−0.35, 0.57) |
0.26 (−0.13, 0.65) |
−0.82 ** (−1.07, −0.57) |
0.09 (−0.28, 0.47) |
1 Controlling for age, relationship status, education, employment. 2 p-value: * <0.1; ** <0.05.