Table A2.

Quality assessment ¹ of qualitative studies.

	Topic	Adams et al., 2019 [14]	Bailey et al., 2015 [21]	Bell et al., 2015 [22]	Castelli, 2018 [27]	Entilli et al., 2021 [15]	Gall et al., 2015 [26]	Hunt et al., 2019 [9]	Jahn et al., 2018 [20]	Leichtentritt et al., 2015 [25]	Maple et al., 2013 [16]	Ross et al., 2018 [17]	Sands et al., 2010 [18]	Wood et al., 2012 [23]
	Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity
	Personal characteristics
1	Interviewer/facilitator	p. 2 324–325			p. 4			p. 337			p. 59	p. 3	p. 103
2	Credentials	p. 325				p. 2						p. 2	p. 121
3	Occupation	p. 325				p. 2				p. 1107	p. 59	p. 3	p. 121
4	Gender	p. 324				p. 2		p. 337				p. 2	p.105/121
5	Experience and training	p. 325			p. 4	p. 2				p. 1107	p. 59	p. 2	p. 121
	Relationship with participants
6	Relationship established				p. 4									p. 878
7	Participant knowledge of the interviewer							p. 337				p. 3
8	Interviewer characteristics	p. 324–325						p. 337			p. 59	p. 2
	Domain 2: Study design
	Theoretical framework
9	Methodological orientation and theory	p. 325	p. 75	p. 379	p. 3–4	p. 3	p. 102	p. 336	p. 6	p. 1105–1106	p. 59	p. 2–3	p. 99–102	p. 877
	Participant selection
10	Sampling	p. 325	p. 74	p. 378	p. 4	p. 2–3	p. 101	p. 336	p. 5	p. 1105	p. 59	p. 2	p. 103	p. 877
11	Method of approach	p. 325	p. 74	p. 378	p. 4	p. 2	p. 101–102	p. 336–337	p. 5–6	p. 1105	p. 59	p. 2	p. 103–104	p. 877–879
12	Sample size	p. 325	p. 74	p. 378	p. 5	p. 2	p. 101	p. 336	p. 5	p. 1105	p. 59	p. 2–3	p. 103	p. 877
13	Non-participation	p. 325				p. 2–3
	Setting
14	Setting of data collection	p. 325	p. 75		p. 4	p. 2		p. 336	p. 5		p. 59	p. 2	p. 103	p. 878
15	Presence of non-participants										p. 59
16	Description of sample	p. 325	p. 74	p. 378	p. 5	p. 2–3	p. 101	p. 336	p. 5	p. 1105	p. 59	p. 2–3	p. 103	p. 877–878
	Data collection
17	Interview guide	p. 325	p. 74–75	p. 378	p. 3–4	p. 2	p. 102	p. 337	p. 5–6	p. 1106	p. 59	p. 2	p. 103–104	p. 878–879
18	Repeat interviews					p. 2	p. 102					p. 2
19	Audio/visual recording	p. 325	p. 75	p. 378	p. 4	p. 2	p. 102	p. 337		p. 1106	p. 59	p. 2	p. 103	p. 879
20	Field notes				p. 4					p. 1107
21	Duration	p. 325	p. 75		p. 4	p. 3	p. 101			p. 1106	p. 59	p. 2	p. 103–104	p. 878
22	Data saturation				p. 5	p. 2		p. 338				p. 2–3
23	Transcripts returned				p. 5
	Domain 3: Analysis and findings
	Data analysis
24	Number of data coders	p. 325				p. 3	p. 102	p. 337	p. 6			p. 3	p. 105	p. 879
25	Description of the coding tree	p. 326				p. 3–6		p. 337–338
26	Derivation of themes	p. 325	p. 75	p. 378	p. 4	p. 3	p. 102	p. 337	p. 6	p. 1107	p. 59	p. 3	p. 105–106	p. 879
27	Software				p. 4	p. 3			p. 6			p. 3
28	Participant checking				p. 5			p. 337
	Reporting
29	Quotations presented	p. 326–329	p. 76–81	p. 380–385	p. 6–14	p. 3–6	p. 102–108	p. 338–342	p. 6–10	p. 1108–1114	p. 60–64	p. 3–6	p. 107–113	p. 880–888
30	Data and findings consistent	p. 329–331	p. 81–83	p. 383–386	p. 14–17	p. 6–10	p. 108–110	p. 342–343	p. 10–11	p. 1115–1117	p. 65–67	p. 7–8	p. 114–117	p. 888–894
31	Clarity of major themes	p. 326–329	p. 78–81	p. 379–382	p. 5–14	p. 3–6	p. 102–108	p. 338–342	p. 6–10	p. 1107–1115	p. 60–64	p. 3	p. 106–114	p. 880–888
32	Clarity of minor themes					p. 3–6		p. 338–342					p. 105–106	p. 880–888
	Rating
	Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity	6/8 (75%)	0/8 (0%)	0/8 (0%)	3/8 (38%)	4/8 (50%)	0/8 (0%)	4/8 (50%)	0/8 (0%)	2/8 (25%)	4/8 (50%)	7/8 (88%)	5/8 (63%)	1/8 (13%)
	Domain 2: Study design	10/15 (67%)	9/15 (60%)	7/15 (47%)	12/15 (80%)	12/15 (80%)	9/15 (60%)	9/15 (60%)	7/15 (47%)	9/15 (60%)	10/15 (67%)	11/15 (73%)	9/15 (60%)	9/15 (60%)
	Domain 3: Analysis and findings	6/9 (67%)	4/9 (44%)	4/9 (44%)	6/9 (67%)	8/9 (89%)	5/9 (56%)	8/9 (89%)	6/9 (67%)	4/9 (44%)	4/9 (44%)	6/9 (67%)	6/9 (67%)	6/9 (67%)
	Total	22/32 (69%)	13/32 (41%)	11/32 (34%)	21/32 (66%)	24/32 (75%)	14/32 (44%)	21/32 (66%)	13/32 (41%)	15/32 (67%)	18/32 (56%)	24/32 (75%)	20/32 (63%)	16/32 (50%)

¹ Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) [13]. ² In this table, “p.” refers to page numbers.