Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 27;11(5):1307. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051307

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression for patients’ survival.

OS PFS RFS
Variables HR a (95% CI) p HR a (95% CI) p HR a (95% CI) p
Univariate analysis
EA vs. RNU 1.79 (0.35–9.13) 0.486 1.09 (0.60–1.98) 0.768 0.49 (0.25–0.97) 0.042
Age (per 5 years) 1.42 (0.92–2.20) 0.112 1.12 (1.01–1.24) 0.037 1.06 (0.96–1.18) 0.237
Male vs. Female 0.61 (0.11–3.38) 0.568 2.23 (1.24–4.03) 0.008 1.61 (0.84–3.07) 0.151
Tumor grade (High vs. Low) 2.24 (0.27–18.4) 0.452 1.86 (0.99–3.49) 0.053 1.54 (0.78–3.02) 0.211
cT1 vs. cTa 3.53 (0.65–19.1) 0.143 1.47 (0.78–2.75) 0.230 1.40 (0.69–2.80) 0.350
Previous/Conc. UC (Yes vs. No) 0.43 (0.05–3.51) 0.432 1.49 (0.81–2.74) 0.203 1.08 (0.53–2.22) 0.825
Tumor Size (≥3 vs. 3 cm) 0.17 (0.01–3.75) 0.259 b 0.49 (0.25–0.95) 0.034 0.52 (0.26–1.07) 0.075
Tumor location
(RP c/w Ureter vs. Ureter alone) 1.84 (0.31–11.1) 0.505 1.67 (0.92–3.02) 0.090 1.66 (0.87–3.17) 0.128
Hydronephrosis (Yes vs. No) 0.21 (0.03–1.68) 0.139 0.91 (0.51–1.65) 0.763 0.96 (0.50–1.84) 0.897
Adjuvant IVCT (Yes vs. No) 0.79 (0.03–18.4) 0.883 b 3.40 (1.43–8.10) 0.006 2.09 (0.78–5.56) 0.142
CIS (Yes vs. No) 0.42 (0.02–9.64) 0.586 b 1.44 (0.62–3.31) 0.395 2.07 (0.88–4.84) 0.095
Multifocal (Yes vs. No) 0.24 (0.01–6.14) 0.386 b 2.21 (0.91–5.37) 0.080 4.17 (1.32–13.2) 0.015
Multivariate analysis
EA vs. RNU 0.82 (0.38–1.75) 0.607
Age (per 5 years) 1.10 (0.96–1.26) 0.188
Male vs. Female 2.30 (1.21–4.40) 0.012
Tumor Size (≥3 vs. <3 cm) 0.36 (0.16–0.83) 0.016
Adjuvant IVCT (Yes vs. No) 4.08 (1.43–11.7) 0.009
Multifocal (Yes vs. No) 3.62 (1.01–13.0) 0.049

EA, endoscopic ablation; RNU, radical nephroureterectomy; Conc., concomitant; UC, urothelial carcinoma; c/w, with/without; IVCT, intravesical chemotherapy; CIS, carcinoma in situ; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. a Weighted by inverse probability of treatment weights method. b Firth regression; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival.