Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;11(5):1163. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051163

Table 2.

Differences of diaphragm ultrasound imaging between the ALS and SMA subcohorts.

Parameter Outcome ALS (n = 40) SMA (n = 23) p-Value § Multiple Linear Regression Analysis #
Adjusted Correlation Coefficient (95% CI) p-Value
Diaphragm thickness insp. right median (IQR) 2.8 (2.2–3.8) 2.8 (2.3–3.8) 0.881 0.066
(–0.901–1.033)
0.892
Diaphragm thickness insp. left median (IQR) 2.7 (2.4–4.5) 3.2 (2.8–3.5) 0.245 0.573
(–0.528–1.674)
0.301
Diaphragm thickening ratio right median (IQR) 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.3 (1.2–1.5) 0.006 0.099
(–0.097–0.294)
0.317
Diaphragm thickening ratio left median (IQR) 1.2 (1.1–1.4) 1.3 (1.2–1.5) 0.080 0.129
(–0.171–0.428)
0.393
Diaphragm thickening fraction right median (IQR) 15.9 (5.5–26.5) 31.8 (17.6–45) 0.006 10.006
(–9.698–29.710)
0.313
Diaphragm thickening fraction left median (IQR) 19 (10.0–37.5) 30.7 (20.2–48.8) 0.080 12.856
(–17.135–42.846)
0.393
Diaphragm excursion right median (IQR) 8.1 (5.1–12.2) 13.5 (8.0–20.0) 0.002 5.138
(–0.778–11.054)
0.087
Diaphragm excursion left median (IQR) 10.0 (6.3–12.0) 11.8 (8.6–15.8) 0.057 7.040
(1.458–12.621)
0.015

Depicted are median (IQR) values of diaphragm ultrasound parameters in both ALS and SMA. § p Values are from the Mann-Whitney-U test (numeric variables). # Multivariate linear regression (for continuous outcome variables) analyses were performed to adjust for the candidate covariates sex, age, and BMI. The reported correlation coefficient (B, 95% CI) > 0 indicates the magnitude of the positive correlation of the disease entity (ALS vs. SMA) on the respective diaphragm parameter after adjustment for sex, age, and BMI. Bold indicates p values < 0.05.