Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD006071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006071.pub2

Christmann 2002.

Methods Two‐center, randomized, controlled trial 
 I. Blinding of randomization ‐ can't tell 
 II. Blinding of intervention ‐ no 
 III. Complete follow‐up ‐ no 
 IV. Blinding of outcome measurements ‐ can't tell
Participants Study conducted in The Netherlands 
 32 infants (26‐35 weeks) with echocardiographic evidence of PDA were randomized. 
 18 infants, mean GA 29.4±0.5 weeks, >33 weeks 1, BW 1150±77 g, postnatal age 4±0.7 d (range 1‐14 d) were treated with continuous indomethacin. 
 14 infants, mean GA 30.8±0.5 weeks, >33 weeks 2, BW 1424±150 g, postnatal age 5±1.4 d (range 2‐22 d) were treated with bolus indomethacin.
Interventions Both groups received the same total amount of indomethacin (0.4mg/kg). 
 In the continuous group, indomethacin was administered during 36 h period at a dose of 0.011 mg/kg/h, intravenously. 
 In the bolus group, indomethacin was administered intravenously in three doses, rapidly within 30 seconds: Initial injection dose was 0.2 mg/kg and the subsequent doses were 0.1 mg/kg at 12 and 36 h after the initial dose.
Outcomes PDA closure 
 Reopening of PDA after completion of the allocated treatment 
 Neonatal mortality 
 IVH 
 NEC 
 Blood flow velocities: ICA, RA and SMA ‐ before indomethacin and at 10, 30, 60, 120 minutes and 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after initiation of indomethacin therapy 
 Hemoglobin 
 Hematocrit 
 Platelet count 
 Serum sodium, potassium, BUN and creatinine 
 Blood gasses 
 Ventilator settings 
 Medications 
 Exposure to phototherapy 
 Urine output 
 HR 
 BP 
 Arterial oxygen saturation 
 tcpO2, tcpCO2
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Blinding of randomization ‐ can't tell
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of intervention ‐ no 
 Blinding of outcome measurements ‐ can't tell
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Complete follow‐up ‐ no