Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;14(5):1045. doi: 10.3390/nu14051045

Table 7.

Model 2 mediation Analysis of eating behaviors on the relationship between perceived stress and dietary risk for males.

Variables B SE T p Value
Perceived stress → restrained eating −0.0612 0.3544 −0.1726 0.8631
Perceived stress → uncontrolled eating 1.0656 0.2814 3.7871 0.0002
Perceived stress → emotional eating 1.2048 0.3889 3.0980 0.0021
Perceived stress → dietary risk 1.8040 1.0969 1.6447 0.1009
Restrained eating → dietary risk −0.0291 0.0250 −1.1649 0.2448
Uncontrolled eating → dietary risk 0.0022 0.0278 0.0781 0.9378
Emotional eating → dietary risk −0.0111 0.0183 −0.0636 0.5465
Bootstrap Effect SE LL95% CI UL95% CI
Restrained eating −0.0076 0.0052 −0.0189 0.0018
Uncontrolled eating 0.0072 0.0056 −0.0028 0.0196
Emotional eating 0.0057 0.0056 −0.0046 0.0178

Note: male students n = 374. B = beta coefficient; SE = standard error; T = t-test statistic. → indicates the relationship between the two variables.