Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;12(5):840. doi: 10.3390/nano12050840

Table 1.

Comparison of maximum current and power efficiency for different types of FCs.

Electrode Catalyst Fabrication Method Types of FCs Maximum Current/
Power Efficiency
Reference
ITO-PEN a
ITO-PEN a
TM b/GO c
TM b
Electro-spraying Photosynthetic electrons from plant 3.92 μA/cm2
0.41 μA/cm2
[71]
GC d TM b/rGO e Electro-reduction and electro-deposition Photobioelectrochemical FCs 5.24 µA/cm2 [72]
ITO f GO c-TM b
rGO e-TM b
Drop-casting Photoelectrochemical 21.37 µA/cm2
18.95 µA/cm2
[73]
CC g TiO2/rGO e Electro-spinning BPV 34.66 mW/m2 [74]
Glass rGO e film LB method Biological - [34]
ITO f rGO e film LB method BPV 6.94 × 105 W/m2 [70]
ITO f rGO e film LB method BPV 0.14 mW/m2 [62]

a Indium tin oxide-coated polyethylene naphthalate; b thylakoid membrane; c grapheneoxide; d glassy carbon rotating disk electrodes; e reduced graphene oxide; f indium tin oxide; g carbon cloth.