Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 7;14(5):1124. doi: 10.3390/nu14051124

Table 5.

Distribution of sIgA levels (low, normal, high) a and PMA (zero or greater than zero) in the study groups.

Probiotics (n = 14) Placebo (n = 16) Significance b
Level of sIgA
Baseline, n (%)
Low 3 (21.5) 4 (25.0) p-value = 0.883
Normal 8 (57.0) 10 (62.5)
High 3 (21.5) 2 (12.5)
Outcome, n (%)
Low 4 (28.5) 5 (31) p-value = 0.8959
Normal 6 (43.0) 8 (50)
High 4 (28.5) 3 (19)
Washout, n (%)
Low 3 (21.5) 2 (12.5) p-value = 0.4369
Normal 7 (50.0) 12 (75.0)
High 4 (28.5) 2 (12.5)
PMA
Baseline, n (%)
PMA = 0 11 (79) 12 (75) p-value = 1.0
PMA > 0 3 (21) 4 (25)
Outcome, n (%)
PMA = 0 13 (93) 13 (81) p-value = 0.6015
PMA > 0 1 (7) 3 (19)
Washout, n (%)
PMA = 0 14 (100) 13 (81) p-value = 0.2276
PMA > 0 - 3 (19)

a According to manufacturer’s instructions (IgA secretory ELISA-BEST kit); b Fisher’s exact test; sIgA—secretory immunoglobulin A; PMA—papillary marginal attached index.