Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;2022:6571987. doi: 10.1155/2022/6571987

Table 2.

PWT changes of rats in different groups (n = 6).

Group n 0 (d) 3 (d) 7 (d) 10 (d) 14 (d)
Sham-con 6 18.385 ± 4.107 17.793 ± 4.207 18.190 ± 4.139 18.499 ± 3.391 19.018 ± 5.072
Sham-ips 6 18.007 ± 5.819 19.636 ± 4.659 19.393 ± 4.847 17.717 ± 4.092 16.290 ± 3.328
SNI-con 6 18.513 ± 3.356 18.551 ± 3.639 18.579 ± 3.606 17.689 ± 4.514 18.023 ± 2.874
SNI-ips 6 17.260 ± 2.859 11.671 ± 1.374 6.608 ± 3.569∗∗∗ 5.610 ± 2.962∗∗ 5.822 ± 2.424∗∗∗

Notes: Fgroup = 3.914, P = 0.006; Ftime = 21.947, P0.001;  , P < 0.05,  ∗∗, P < 0.01,  ∗∗∗, P < 0.001 compared with the Sham-ips group. Repeated measures ANOVA was used, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure