Table 3.
Group | n | Mki67 | Tjp1 | Ext1 | Rnaseh2c | Emc4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | 95% CI | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | Mean ± SD | 95% CI | ||
Sham | 6 | 1.000 ± 0.271 | 1.22–2.89 | 1.000 ± 0.169 | −0.348–0.439 | 1.000 ± 0.236 | −0.006–0.867 | 1.000 ± 0.368 | −0.128–0.711 | 1.000 ± 0.234 | −0.787–0.297 |
SNI | 6 | 3.053 ± 0.797∗∗∗ | 1.045 ± 0.371 | 1.431 ± 0.401 | 1.291 ± 0.269 | 0.458 ± 0.054 ∗∗ | |||||
t | 5.976 | 0.273 | 2.269 | 1.565 | −5.527 | ||||||
P | 0.001 | 0.793 | 0.053 | 0.151 | 0.002 |
Notes: ∗∗, P < 0.01, ∗∗∗, P < 0.001 compared with the Sham group. The data in the two groups were normally distributed. Student's t-test was carried out to compare the expression of the five hub genes. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.