Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;298(3):101629. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101629

Table 2.

Comparison of Michaelis–Menten and Hill fits for lauric acid ω-1-hydroxylation by CYP168A1

Model fit Km/S50 ± SE (μM) Vmax ± SE (nmol/min/nmol P450) R2 Correct fit probability Difference of AICc
Michaelis-Menten 46 ± 5 0.14 ± 0.006 0.98 0.02% 16.85
Hill 34 ± 2 (n = 1.5) 0.12 ± 0.004 0.99 99.98%

Abbreviations: AICc, second order Akaike Information Criterion; n, cooperativity value for the substrate binding to the enzyme; SE, standard error.