Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;34(8):1733–1746. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02096-x

Table 4.

Association of GPS quantified enacted mobility with facilitators and barriers–physical function, cognitive function, psychosocial factors, and external environment

Category Laboratory test GPS
Space Time
Count Extent Shape Duration
a Physical function
Walking endurance 400 m walk test a (58)* a (58)*
Balance One leg standing a (45) a (45)
Combined function assessments
Performance-based Short physical performance battery a (58)* a (58)* a (58)*
Timed up and go a (45) b (45)
Self-reported Short form survey − 36 a (21) a (21), a (59) a (21), a (59)
b. Cognitive function
Executive function Trail making test A and B b (58) a (59), b (55) b (58)
Planning ability HOTAP a (63), a (34)
Visuospatial attention Attention window test a (63), a (34)
Spatial memory Grid span test a (45) a (63), a (34), a (45)
Working memory Digit span test (forward and backward) a (59)
Episodic memory Word list learning, word list recall, logical memory-I, logical memory-II a (59) a (59) a (59)
c. Psychosocial factors
Psychological
Depression

Geriatric depression scale

Geriatric depression scale

(Short version)

a (58)* a (58)*

a (58)*

a (59)

Negative affect Positive and negative affect scale b (21) b (21) b (21)
Anxiety State-trait anxiety inventory b (45) b (45)
Confidence and attitudes
Fear of falling Fall efficacy scale a (58)**, b (45) a (58)*, a (34), b (45) a (58)*
Ageism Ageism survey scale a (34)
Quality of life Life satisfaction 1–10 scale a (21) a (21)
d. Environmental factors
Weather Temperature b (34) a (70)
Rain a (70)
Neighborhood Walkability a (71)c

HOTAP attention and planning assessment scale

*association only with pedestrian-based measures; **association only with vehicular trips

aAssociation in expected direction

bNo association found

cLarger activity space for less-walkable neighborhood