Table 8.
Results sensitivity analysis on the economic value of changes in technical performance and the gross margin of the intervention farms (indices are shown in parentheses).
| Price | Performance parameter | 10% price decrease | 5% price decrease | Baseline | 5% price increase | 10% price increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer price | EV ADG constant cycle duration | 253 (75) | 295 (88) | 336 (100) | 377 (112) | 419 (125) |
| EV ADGconstant weight | 86 (58) | 117 (79) | 148 (100) | 179 (121) | 210 (142) | |
| EV MR | −33 (91) | −35 (96) | −36 (100) | −38 (104) | −39 (109) | |
| Δ Gross margin | 80 (57) | 110 (78) | 140 (100) | 171 (122) | 201 (143) | |
| Feed price | EV FCR | 4 (90) | 4 (95) | 5 (100) | 5 (105) | 5 (110) |
| EV ADGconstant cycle duration | 385 (115) | 361 (107) | 336 (100) | 312 (93) | 287 (85) | |
| EV ADGconstant weight | 185 (125) | 166 (112) | 148 (100) | 130 (88) | 112 (76) | |
| Δ Gross margin | 187 (133) | 164 (117) | 140 (100) | 117 (83) | 94 (67) | |
| Day-old chick price | EV ADGconstant weight | 159 (107) | 154 (103) | 148 (100) | 144 (97) | 139 (93) |
| EV MR | −36 (99) | −36 (99) | −36 (100) | −36 (101) | −37 (101) |