Table 8.
Comparative results for the Hamrawein, Egypt magnetic field anomaly (case study 2).
| Model parameters | Salem et al. (2005) | Salem (2005) | Salem (2011) | Essa and Elhussein (2018) | Mehanee et al. (2020) | Present study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly 1 | ||||||
| K (nT) | - | - | 127595.3 | 507.64 | 102046.00 | 99784.10 |
| d (m) | 555.7 | 540.0 | 486.5 | 623.05 | 480.00 | 491.71 |
| xo (m) | 4526.0 | 4530.0 | - | 4255.98 | 4550.00 | 4416.84 |
| α (o) | - | 21.4 | - | - | 70.49 | 68.21 |
| p | 1.4 | - | 1.0 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.94 |
| Anomaly 2 | ||||||
| K (nT) | - | - | 83746.7 | 427.38 | 56549.52 | 57302.7 |
| d (m) | 441.2 | 477.0 | 440.4 | 494.14 | 400.00 | 414.69 |
| xo (m) | 14858.0 | 14850.0 | - | 14823.96 | 15200.00 | 14900.3 |
| α (o) | - | - | - | 37.21 | 55.04 | 54.06 |
| p | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.91 |