Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;22(5):2016. doi: 10.3390/s22052016

Table 9.

Cross-dataset analysis on the full retinal tissue segmentation results, presenting the mean (standard deviation) mean signed and absolute boundary errors (in pixels) results. Three different training/testing combinations were included for each model, including: (i) Using only the original dataset (O.D./O.D.), (ii) training adding the AMD dataset images (O.D. + AMD), and testing only on O.D. and (iii) training adding the AMD dataset images (O.D. + AMD), and testing only on AMD. The O.D. dataset denotes original healthy dataset imaged with the Spectralis device and the AMD dataset denotes the pathology dataset imaged with the Bioptigen device.

Data Mask R-CNN U-Net FCN DeeplabV3
Trained/ Tested ILM RPE ILM RPE ILM RPE ILM RPE
Mean signed error
O.D./O.D. −0.063 (0.133) 0.125 (0.119) −0.456 (0.040) −0.447 (0.073) 0.526 (0.036) 0.461 (0.276) 0.527 (0.034) 0.376 (0.053)
O.D. + AMD/O.D. 0.451 (0.270) −0.169 (0.010) 0.312 (0.007) 0.121 (0.102) 0.265 (0.148) 0.199 (0.103) 0.175 (0.084) 0.151 (0.074)
O.D. + AMD/AMD 1.299 (0.398) −0.975 (0.810) −0.034 (0.078) 0.030 (0.134) −0.093 (0.032) −0.140 (0.044) 0.035 (0.061) −0.018 (0.140)
Mean absolute error
O.D./O.D. 0.960 (0.017) 0.941 (0.017) 0.601 (0.015) 0.596 (0.041) 0.744 (0.015) 0.870 (0.050) 0.736 (0.016) 0.763 (0.020)
O.D. + AMD/O.D. 1.250 (0.316) 0.995 (0.187) 0.629 (0.002) 0.559 (0.052) 0.507 (0.060) 0.497 (0.037) 0.482 (0.020) 0.511 (0.026)
O.D. + AMD/AMD 1.887 (0.308) 2.434 (0.159) 0.343 (0.019) 0.408 (0.014) 0.387 (0.011) 0.523 (0.024) 0.421 (0.004) 0.557 (0.021)