Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;150:e50. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822000243

Table 1.

A summary of time series methods for describing, comparing and explaining the seasonality of the 14 most cited gastrointestinal infections from our review

Pathogen Total citations Discrete seasons Seasonal curves as continuous processes
Two seasons Four seasons Monthly records Average smoothers Cubic splines STL models SARIMA models Harmonic regressions Spectral analyses
Salmonella 66 5 25 22 1 2 12
Campylobacter 45 2 20 9 1 1 1 9 2
Gastroenteritis 38 1 15 15 1 2 4
Vibrio 20 2 7 4 1 2 4
Norovirus 19 3 9 6
E. coli 18 14 1 1 2
Cryptosporidium 17 2 1 10 1 3
Yersinia 11 7 3 1
Shigella 11 7 2 2
Giardia 10 1 3 3 1 2
Listeria 9 6 2 1
Cyclospora 6 1 1 4 1
Rotavirus 6 2 1 3 1
Clostridium 2 2
Total 215 17 76 74 2 4 2 7 31 2

We ranked pathogens in descending order by total citations. We divided methods by comparisons of discrete seasons and the construction of seasonal curves. Discrete seasons methods included comparisons by two seasons, four seasons or calendar months. Seasonal curve methods included average smoothers, cubic splines, seasonal trend decomposition (STL), seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) models, harmonic regression models and spectral analyses. Column and row totals are less than the sum of all rows and columns, respectively, as many publications investigated multiple pathogens and used multiple methodologies to describe, compare and explain seasonality features.