Table 1.
Approach name | Theory or model/framework | Inclusion criteria (for review team consensus) | Instances (first author, publication year) |
Behavioural Model of Health Services Use | Theory | Within Andersen (1995), the theory is described as being able to both predict and explain individual’s health services use. Predisposing factors to services use, and their relations to one another, are described. | Smith GC, 2016, Zapka J, 2014; Roche CC, 2012 |
CHOICES Conceptual Model | Model/Framework | The model was developed with Social Cognitive Theory and the Stages of Change Model. The model does not relate the factors that contribute to behaviour to one another. |
Chalela P, 2018 |
Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model)* | Theory | N/A | Fahim C, 2019 |
Goal Setting Theory* | Theory | N/A | Amorrortu RP, 2018, Tilley BC, 2017 |
Health Belief Model* | Theory | N/A | Nyaoke BA, 2017; Kinney AY, 1998; Verheggen FW, 1998, Yeomans-Kinney A, 1995; |
Health Promotion Model* | Theory | N/A | Sample DA, 2002 |
Model of Cancer Clinical Trial Decision making | Model/Framework | The model was developed using the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change. The model does not relate factors the that contribute to behaviour to one another. | Wenzel JA, 2015 |
Rotter’s Social Learning Theory and Locus of Control | Theory | Included paper describes in detail the factors that this theory identifies as relevant to behaviour, how they interact, and how they can be used to predict behaviour. | Bradley JM, 2006 |
Self-regulation/Goal Theory | Theory | The included paper cited a review of theories as the source of what it called ‘self-regulation/goal theory’. However, no theories reported in this source matched this description. Instead, the authors of this review, who are also the authors of the included study, seem to describe an amalgamation of these theories. That description gave sufficient detail about factors that contribute to behaviour and how they relate to each other to predict behaviour. | Huisman S, 2010 |
Social Cognitive Theory/Social Learning theory* | Theory | N/A | Ortiz AP, 2019, Amorrortu RP, 2018, Tilley BC, 2017, Gwadz MV, 2010, Coday M, 2005, Bradley JM, 2006, Bowen D, 2000 Corbie-Smith G, 2012 |
Theoretical Domains Framework | Model/Framework | This framework is known to the authors and the cited sources confirmed that it is derived from several behavioural theories. | Gillies K, 2018; Ellis SD, 2019 Guillot M, 2019, Fahim C, 2019, Goulao B, 2020 |
Theory of Planned Behaviour/Reasoned action* | Theory | N/A | Manton KJ, 2019, Quinn GP, 2011; Kinney AY, 1998 Arriens C, 2020; Vandenburgh AM, 2000; Corbie-Smith G, 2012 |
Integrated Theoretical Model | Model/Framework | This model was developed using the Theory of Triadic Influence*. The model does not relate factors the that contribute to behaviour to one another. | Gwadz M, 2014 |
Transdisciplinary Theoretical Model | Theory | This theory describes individual attitudes and beliefs and how they interact to inform decisions of trial participation (behaviour). | Eggly S, 2017 |
Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change/Stages of Change Model* | Theory | N/A | Clark LT, 2019, Amorrortu RP, 2018, Tilley BC, 2017 |
*Referenced in Davis et al.10
N/A, Not applicable.