Table 2.
Test name | Techniques | Kind of assessment | Output | Specific equipment required |
---|---|---|---|---|
Static measurement | ||||
Von Frey filament testing | Calibrated nylon filaments of various thickness (and applied force) are pressed against the skin of the plantar surface of the paw in ascending order of force | Stimulus- evoked pain-like behavior Mechanical stimuli - Tactile allodynia The most commonly used test |
Latency to paw withdrawal and Force exerted are recorded |
Yes |
Knee extension test | Apply a knee extension on both the intact and affected knee or Passive extension range of the operated knee joint under anesthesia |
Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior | Number of vocalizations evoked in 5 extensions | None |
Hotplate | Mouse placed on hotplate. A cutoff latency has been determined to avoid lesions | Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior Heat stimuli- thermal sensitivity |
Latency of paw withdrawal | Yes |
Righting ability | Mouse placed on its back | Neuromuscular screening | Latency to regain its footing | None |
Cotton swab test | Bringing a cotton swab into contact with eyelashes, pinna, and whiskers | Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior Neuromuscular screening |
Withdrawal or twitching response | None |
Spontaneous activity | ||||
Spontaneous cage activity | One by one the cages must be laid out in a specific platform | Spontaneous pain behavior Nonstimulus evoked pain Activity |
Vibrations evoked by animal movements | Yes |
Open field analysis | Experiment is performed in a clear chamber and mice can freely explore | Spontaneous pain behavior Nonstimulus evoked pain Locomotor analysis |
Paw print assessment Distance traveled, average walking speed, rest time, rearing |
Yes |
Gait analysis | Mouse is placed in a specific cage equipped with a fluorescent tube and a glass plate allowing an automated quantitative gait analysis | Nonstimulus evoked pain Gait analysis Indirect nociception |
Intensity of the paw contact area, velocity, stride frequency, length, symmetry, step width | Yes |
Dynamic weight bearing system | Mouse placed is a specific cage. This method is a computerized capacitance meter (similar to gait analysis) | Nonstimulus evoked pain Weight-bearing deficits Indirect nociception |
Body weight redistribution to a portion of the paw surface | Yes |
Voluntary wheel running | Mouse placed is a specific cage with free access to stainless steel activity wheels. The wheel is connected to a computer that automatically record data | Nonstimulus evoked pain Activity |
Distance traveled in the wheel | Yes |
Burrowing analysis | Mouse placed is a specific cage equipped with steel tubes (32 cm in length and 10 cm in diameter) and quartz sand in Plexiglas cages (600 · 340x200 mm) | Nonstimulus evoked pain Activity |
Amount of sand burrowed | Yes |
Digital video recordings | Mouse placed is a specific cage according to the tool | Nonstimulus evoked pain Or Evoked pain |
Scale of pain or specific outcome | Yes |
Digital ventilated cage system | Nondisrupting capacitive-based technique: records spontaneous activity 24/7, during both light and dark phases directly from the home cage rack | Spontaneous pain behavior Nonstimulus evoked pain Activity-behavior |
Distance walked, average speed, occupation front, occupation rear, activation density. Animal locomotion index, animal tracking distance, animal tracking speed, animal running wheel distance and speed or rotation |
Yes |
Challenged activity | ||||
Rotarod test | Gradual and continued acceleration of a rotating rod onto which mice are placed | Motor coordination Indirect nociception |
Rotarod latency: riding time and speed with a maximum cut off. | Yes |
Hind limb and fore grip strength | Mouse placed over a base plate in front of a connected grasping tool | Muscle strength of limbs | Peak force, time resistance | Yes |
Wire hang analysis | Suspension of the mouse on the wire and start the time | Muscle strength of limbs: muscle function and coordination | Latency to fall gripping | None (self -constructed) |
Pain cannot be directly measured in rodents, so methods have been developed to quantify “pain-like” behaviors. The clinical assessment of mice should be tested both before and after the intervention (induced-OA ± administration of treatment) to take into account the habituation and establish a baseline to compare against.