Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;72(1):3–13. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000043

Table 2.

Outcome options in mouse models of osteoarthritis

Test name Techniques Kind of assessment Output Specific equipment required
Static measurement
Von Frey filament testing Calibrated nylon filaments of various thickness (and applied force) are pressed against the skin of the plantar surface of the paw in ascending order of force Stimulus- evoked pain-like behavior
Mechanical stimuli - Tactile allodynia
The most commonly used test
Latency to paw withdrawal
and
Force exerted are recorded
Yes
Knee extension test Apply a knee extension on both the intact and affected knee
or
Passive extension range of the operated knee joint under anesthesia
Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior Number of vocalizations evoked in 5 extensions None
Hotplate Mouse placed on hotplate. A cutoff latency has been determined to avoid lesions Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior
Heat stimuli- thermal sensitivity
Latency of paw withdrawal Yes
Righting ability Mouse placed on its back Neuromuscular screening Latency to regain its footing None
Cotton swab test Bringing a cotton swab into contact with eyelashes, pinna, and whiskers Stimulus-evoked pain-like behavior
Neuromuscular screening
Withdrawal or twitching response None
Spontaneous activity
Spontaneous cage activity One by one the cages must be laid out in a specific platform Spontaneous pain behavior
Nonstimulus evoked pain
Activity
Vibrations evoked by animal movements Yes
Open field analysis Experiment is performed in a clear chamber and mice can freely explore Spontaneous pain behavior
Nonstimulus evoked pain
Locomotor analysis
Paw print assessment
Distance traveled, average walking speed, rest time, rearing
Yes
Gait analysis Mouse is placed in a specific cage equipped with a fluorescent tube and a glass plate allowing an automated quantitative gait analysis Nonstimulus evoked pain
Gait analysis
Indirect nociception
Intensity of the paw contact area, velocity, stride frequency, length, symmetry, step width Yes
Dynamic weight bearing system Mouse placed is a specific cage. This method is a computerized capacitance meter (similar to gait analysis) Nonstimulus evoked pain
Weight-bearing deficits
Indirect nociception
Body weight redistribution to a portion of the paw surface Yes
Voluntary wheel running Mouse placed is a specific cage with free access to stainless steel activity wheels. The wheel is connected to a computer that automatically record data Nonstimulus evoked pain
Activity
Distance traveled in the wheel Yes
Burrowing analysis Mouse placed is a specific cage equipped with steel tubes (32 cm in length and 10 cm in diameter) and quartz sand in Plexiglas cages (600 · 340x200 mm) Nonstimulus evoked pain
Activity
Amount of sand burrowed Yes
Digital video recordings Mouse placed is a specific cage according to the tool Nonstimulus evoked pain
Or
Evoked pain
Scale of pain or specific outcome Yes
Digital ventilated cage system Nondisrupting capacitive-based technique: records spontaneous activity 24/7, during both light and dark phases directly from the home cage rack Spontaneous pain behavior
Nonstimulus evoked pain
Activity-behavior
Distance walked, average speed, occupation front, occupation rear, activation density.
Animal locomotion index, animal tracking distance, animal tracking speed, animal running wheel distance and speed or rotation
Yes
Challenged activity
Rotarod test Gradual and continued acceleration of a rotating rod onto which mice are placed Motor coordination
Indirect nociception
Rotarod latency: riding time and speed with a maximum cut off. Yes
Hind limb and fore grip strength Mouse placed over a base plate in front of a connected grasping tool Muscle strength of limbs Peak force, time resistance Yes
Wire hang analysis Suspension of the mouse on the wire and start the time Muscle strength of limbs: muscle function and coordination Latency to fall gripping None
(self -constructed)

Pain cannot be directly measured in rodents, so methods have been developed to quantify “pain-like” behaviors. The clinical assessment of mice should be tested both before and after the intervention (induced-OA ± administration of treatment) to take into account the habituation and establish a baseline to compare against.