Table 2.
Acceptability and appropriateness of the training
| Subscale | M | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability (Cronbach’s α = 0.94) | 4.68 | 0.56 |
| • To what extent are you satisfied with the training you received? | 4.68 | 0.62 |
| • How professional did you find the trainers? | 4.68 | 0.65 |
| • How well organized and executed do you believe the training program to be? | 4.66 | 0.64 |
| • How satisfied are you with the content of the training covered? | 4.72 | 0.58 |
| • How satisfied are you with the exercises contained within the training? | 4.64 | 0.62 |
| Appropriateness (Cronbach’s α = 0.91) | 4.47 | 0.61 |
| • How compatible are the information and practices with your work mission or service provision mandate? | 4.51 | 0.63 |
| • How relevant are the information and practices to your client population? | 4.57 | 0.69 |
| • How well do the information and practices fit with your current approach to work? | 4.36 | 0.77 |
| • How compatible are the information and practices with your workflow timing (e.g., when and for how long you see clients)? | 4.41 | 0.74 |
| • How well do the information and practices from the training fit with your overall approach to service delivery in the setting in which you provide care? | 4.49 | 0.74 |
M: mean; SD: standard deviation.
Collected at T2 post-training survey (n=200). Likert responses ranged from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater positive endorsement (1 Not at all, 2 Slightly, 3 Moderately, 4 Very, 5 Extremely).