Table 2.

Logistic regression of reported increased gambling or decreased gambling following the intervention (N=327).

Variable		ORa (95% CI)		P value
Associations with the reporting of increased gambling following the intervention (n=26)
	Regulation perceived as very bad or fairly bad	4.39 (1.88-10.30)	<.001
	Moderate-risk/problem gambler	6.89 (1.53-31.00)	.01
	Age	0.96 (0.93-1.00)	.05
Associations with the reporting of decreased gambling following the intervention (n=125)
	Regulation perceived as very good or fairly good	3.43 (2.12-5.54)	<.001
	Moderate-risk/problem gambler	1.02 (0.60-1.73)	.94
	Age	1.02 (1.00-1.04)	.10

^aOR: odds ratio.