. 2022 Feb 25;9:817957. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817957

Table 1.

Properties of AEW with different ppm, Lifukang, and MNZ.

Solutions	ACC¹ (ppm)	pH	ORP² (mV)
Tap water	1.18 ± 0.33^a	6.96 ± 0.02^a	660.67 ± 29.95^a
	10.97 ± 0.29^b	4.22 ± 0.01^b	843.67 ± 20.29^b
	20.77 ± 0.33^c	4.07 ± 0.03^c	890.67 ± 6.13^c
	30.44 ± 0.50^d	3.85 ± 0.01^d	893.00 ± 2.16^c
	40.01 ± 0.76^e	3.79 ± 0.02^{d, f}	893.67 ± 20.89^{d, c}
AEW³	50.98 ± 0.76^f	3.74 ± 0.06^f	901.67 ± 17.59^{d, c}
	59.47 ± 0.58^g	3.70 ± 0.03^f	908.00 ± 29.41^{d, c}
	69.38 ± 0.50^h	3.71 ± 0.03^f	968.67 ± 40.01^{e, d}
	80.59 ± 1.09ⁱ	3.71 ± 0.03^f	994.33 ± 33.81^{f, e}
Lifukang (10%)	0^j	5.29 ± 0.01ⁱ	234.00 ± 4.32^{f, e}
MNZ⁴ (0.75%)	0^j	5.67 ± 0.02^j	243.67 ± 2.87^{f, e}

ACC, available chlorine concentration (ppm).

ORP, Oxidation reduction potential (mV).

AEW, Acidic electrolyzed water.

⁴

MNZ, metronidazole.

^a−j

Values within the same column with different lowercase letters indicate significantly different (P < 0.05). Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).